Stroboscopic glasses: what 45 studies show about athletes' vision

In brief. Across 45 studies, programs using stroboscopic glasses mostly improve test measures: visuomotor reaction time, reactive agility, short-term visual memory. The effect of a single session of wear during the warm-up splits the trials. Transfer to the match was measured only twice: none in baseball, positive in boxing but gone four weeks after stopping. Updated on November 3, 2026.

Hello to you, the movement professional,

The Footbonaut is a fourteen-by-fourteen-meter cage, with eight ball dispensers and sixty-four targets, that times every pass and scores its accuracy. Eighty-four amateur soccer players played two sessions in it, one in normal vision, the other with stroboscopic glasses whose lenses darken intermittently (Beavan et al., 2021). Picture the ball arriving in flashes, the control half blind, the target searched for between two blackouts. The most skilled quarter lost 11.1% of accuracy, the least skilled quarter 1.9%: those with the most to lose lost the most.

You have probably seen these glasses on social media, often presented as a way to speed up reactions. The objection is legitimate: one more gadget, spectacular on video, with no effect on the match. To answer it, you have to go back through the studies one by one: what was done, in whom, for how long, what was measured, what held up in the field. Does an error provoked in training make the player better once the glasses are off?

Stroboscopic glasses: intermittent visual occlusion, what are we talking about

The lenses of stroboscopic glasses alternate between transparent and opaque, and the player receives the scene as snapshots. Two settings define the exposure: the frequency (5 Hz in a padel trial, from 15 to 9 Hz over the course of a soccer program) and the share of the cycle where the lens is opaque or transparent, depending on each team's convention. In a 2012 trial, the lenses stayed clear for 100 milliseconds and opaque for 150 (Smith and Mitroff, 2012). These conventions complicate comparisons.

The researchers' hypothesis: deprived of part of the information, the visual system learns to make better use of what remains, to extend the trajectory between two images, to anticipate. The studies measure three levels. Early visual processing is read through evoked potentials: the P100 component, generated in the primary visual cortex, and the N2 component of movement onset, arising from the motion-sensitive visual areas. The motor reaction time is split by electromyography into premotor time, from the visual signal to the onset of muscle activity, and motor time. The last level, the sport task, is measured through reactive agility, volley accuracy, smash defense or match statistics.

These studies fall into three uses: multi-week programs built into sport exercises, occasional wear during the warm-up, and a disturbance of balance. The first traces, however, come from the laboratory.

The first laboratory trials with strobe: attention, visual memory, timing

A team from Duke University published among the first stroboscopic training trials. Participants do throwing and catching exercises, some with stroboscopic glasses, others with clear glasses. At retest, the first group improves more in motion sensitivity in the central field and in transient spatial attention; nothing changes in the periphery, nor for multiple object tracking (Appelbaum et al., 2011). The following year, the same protocol improves the retention of information in short-term visual memory, for delays from 640 to 2,560 milliseconds, including in a group tested 24 hours later (Appelbaum et al., 2012).

Faced with a moving visual stimulus whose arrival must be predicted, the stroboscopic group is more accurate right after training and even more consistent ten minutes later; the abstract reports no advantage at the ten-day test (Smith and Mitroff, 2012). In thirty athletes, nine twenty-minute sessions of tennis ball catching over six weeks do not separate a fixed frequency from a progressive one, and the link between perceptual progress and better catching remains a correlation, with no group in normal vision (Wilkins and Gray, 2015).

A perception can therefore be trained under constraint. These studies say nothing about the athlete on his field, and that is where the literature moved.

4 to 12-week programs in athletes: reaction time and reactive agility

The typical design: two groups do the same sport exercises, one with active glasses, the other in normal vision or with clear glasses of identical appearance.

The most consistent signal concerns visuomotor reaction time. In elite young badminton players, the 13-millisecond gain still keeps 10 at retest, six weeks after stopping, and electromyography places it in premotor time, before the contraction. The second part of the same trial associates this gain with faster visual perception, with no change in motor processes, but the group effect on the electroencephalographic indicator does not survive post hoc tests (Hülsdünker et al., 2021, part 2). The detail is in the analysis of stroboscopy in badminton.

In handball players, the P100 advance shows mostly outside the fovea, which connects to the question of the athlete's peripheral vision. In boxing, the percentage of punches landed in fights improves, but the gain is gone four weeks after stopping, as is that of reaction time (Xiao et al., 2026). In soccer, the best-controlled trial (Weng et al., 2026) gains on all five measures, but its full text reports a non-significant multivariate test overall, and it includes neither retention nor a match. The gain is read on the test, and almost nobody has gone looking for it in the match. What happens when the glasses are used for only ten minutes, just before playing?

Stroboscopic glasses in the warm-up: an acute effect that splits the trials

The table tennis case, thirty machine balls to the backhand side returned before and after the warm-up, is detailed in the article on reaction in table tennis.

In the two positive trials, the effect appears only on the measure closest to the trained task: reactive agility with the ball and not without the ball in soccer, volley accuracy and not reactive agility on lights in padel. The padel protocol is taken up in the page on the stroboscopic warm-up in padel. During wear, performance drops: the meta-analysis by Vera et al. (2026) puts this average acute degradation at a standardized difference of about 0.5, in accuracy as in response time.

Repeated in a neuromuscular warm-up in forty basketball players aged 14 to 18, wearing the glasses improves only the reaction and decision components of reactive agility (Dingirdan Gultekinler et al., 2026). An acute effect perhaps exists, narrow and tied to the movement.

Balance, ankle and knee: strobe as a sensory perturbation

A second family of studies degrades vision during balance work. The reasoning goes through the weighting of the three systems: vision, the vestibular system and proprioception share postural control, and when one input becomes less reliable, the others gain weight. This is what is at play when the senses contradict each other.

Two meta-analyses summarize the ankle. Across seven trials and 235 participants, combining glasses and balance training modestly improves balance (d = 0.30) and perceived stability more, evidence the authors call preliminary (Luo et al., 2025). Across ten studies and 353 participants, the risk of bias is higher in the stroboscopic studies than in the transcranial stimulation studies they are compared with (Majelan et al., 2026). Feel the knee going inward at the moment when the stance loads and the image goes dark: this is what Yu et al. (2026) measure in operated athletes, and the authors see in it a possible risk that they did not test.

These studies speak of postural control under constraint, close to the athlete's dynamic balance that the vestibular system organizes together with the eyes. None measured performance in competition.

What transfers to the field, what does not transfer with stroboscopic glasses

What moves, from the most solid to the most fragile: visuomotor reaction time in the laboratory or in testing, reactive agility on a course, short-term visual memory, a few electrophysiological markers. What does not move, or not more than with the same training without glasses: multiple object tracking (Appelbaum 2011, Fortes 2025, whereas it improves in female boxers, Xiao 2026), decision (Fortes 2025, meta-analysis by Wang 2025), preplanned change of direction (Zwierko 2024, Diao 2026), quality of play in badminton players (Hülsdünker 2021), match statistics in baseball (Liu 2020), and in boxing the gain in fights after a month without glasses (Xiao 2026).

The perception-action coupling sheds light on this split: visual information is learned together with the action it triggers. The clearest effects appear when the glasses are worn during sport exercises, and on the measure closest to those exercises. The review by Vater and Strasburger (2021) anticipated this: the best transfer is expected from tools that require a motor response, and the model of stroboscopic glasses studied showed no established link with peripheral vision processing. This is the principle of representative design, and the question that also arises for the transfer from gym to field.

Far transfer, from the test to the match, remains without evidence. Fransen (2024) writes it explicitly for stroboscopy, neurofeedback and executive functions: promises of far transfer are not supported. The scoping review by Li et al. (2026), covering 61 studies and 2,217 participants, concludes that the evidence does not allow stroboscopic training to be considered a method with predictable effects: "Evidence does not support treating SVT as a uniform performance-enhancement intervention". In soccer, the review by Weng et al. (2026) notes consistent progress in the laboratory and a weaker, more uncertain transfer to the field.

Meta-analyses on stroboscopic training: averages drawn from a small pool

Each meta-analysis retains 9 to 17 trials in a literature that is still thin, and their averages probably look alike for that reason; their abstracts do not list the included trials, so we do not know which ones count the same cohort twice. On duration, they contradict each other: six to ten weeks at two or three weekly sessions for Luo and Guo (2025), one to six weeks at one or two sessions for Wang (2025). Luo et al. themselves call these subgroups preliminary. No dose is established.

Links between the studies

The two volleyball trials very probably describe the same sample (fifty young people aged 16.5, 26 boys and 24 girls), two Chinese trials share a registration filed after the fact, and the positive warm-up trials come from the same network of researchers.

Safety of stroboscopic glasses: what the studies almost never report

A mini-review re-read 27 stroboscopic training studies in athletes from a safety angle (Li, Xiao and Xiao, 2026). Only three describe active monitoring of warning signs or adverse events, a fourth describes supervision without structured collection, and only one reports perceived tolerance. The authors list the plausible risk pathways: conflict between vision and the vestibular system, with disorientation during dynamic tasks; injury risk linked to deliberately degraded vision; cognitive fatigue; photosensitivity, still to be characterized. Their conclusion: the safety profile of the method cannot be established from what has been published.

Biomechanics points in the same cautious direction. Under glasses, the load on the knee and hip increases in elite rugby players (Lin et al., 2026), and knee valgus increases in athletes operated on for the cruciate ligament (Yu et al., 2026). These are acute, laboratory measures, with no injury follow-up.

What is established, debated or extrapolated about stroboscopic glasses

Established, across several concordant trials: a multi-week program, built into sport exercises, reduces visuomotor reaction time measured in testing, and performance drops during wear. Debated: the acute effect in the warm-up, positive on a single measure in two trials from the same network and null in a third; balance in ankle instability, on preliminary and biased evidence; the visual mechanism suggested by the P100 and the N2; the gain in the match, positive then lost in boxing, null in baseball. Extrapolated: any lasting gain in the match, any injury prevention, any optimal dose.

Three reservations are added. A basketball trial reports effect sizes of up to about 4 on coordination and change of direction (Li et al., 2026); we do not retain it as evidence until these values are replicated. The trials by Lu (2025) and Diao (2026) share a registration filed after the fact and report effect sizes of 1.3 to 4 on balance, unusual for this type of intervention. The two volleyball trials count as one sample.

Our prediction, which research may refute: in the first trial controlled against placebo glasses that measures both reaction time in testing and a match statistic, the first measure will improve, the second much less or not at all. If the match statistic improves just as much, our reading of transfer is wrong and we will correct it.

Before handing stroboscopic glasses to an athlete: referral

If your athlete reports double vision, persistent blur, headaches during effort or dizziness, visual training waits. He first consults an ophthalmologist, then an orthoptist in France, or an optometrist in Switzerland or the United States. LabO RNP is neither medical nor paramedical, and is added as a complement to a care pathway, never in its place.

LabO RNP works with optometrists; the curriculum was built with them.

Vision, an input of the sensorimotor loop

The eyes are an entry point. What LabO RNP teaches is the entire sensorimotor loop: how what the athlete perceives organizes what he does. Stroboscopic glasses illustrate it without meaning to, since their most solid effects appear when perception stays attached to the movement. The article on oculomotor exercises in the warm-up shows where to place the gaze in a session, and the map of the evidence in sports vision places stroboscopy among the other families of visual training. Reading these studies is free; deciding what you do with them with your athlete requires a framework, and the Introduction to RNP lays its foundations.

The glasses remove images from the player, and the proof is to be sought once he has taken them off.

👉 I want to read the whole loop, not just the eyes.

Stroboscopic glasses: the short answers

Are stroboscopic glasses effective?

On test measures, most often yes: visuomotor reaction time, reactive agility, short-term visual memory. Depending on the meta-analyses and the measures, the average effect ranges from small to large (0.35 to 1.10 in standardized difference). In the match, only two trials have looked: nothing in baseball (Liu et al., 2020), more punches landed in boxing, lost four weeks after stopping (Xiao et al., 2026).

How many weeks do the studied programs last?

In the trials cited here, from four to twelve weeks in athletes, with glasses worn during the usual sport exercises. The meta-analyses do not agree on the most effective duration: six to ten weeks for two of them, one to six for a third. No dose is established.

Can you wear stroboscopic glasses in the warm-up before a match?

The three trials that tested a single warm-up diverge. In table tennis, the glasses add nothing (Strainchamps et al., 2023). In soccer and padel, a measure close to the movement improves after wear, another does not (Zwierko et al., 2024; Vera et al., 2026). During wear, performance drops on average (meta-analysis by Vera et al., 2026).

Do stroboscopic glasses improve balance?

Several trials, in chronic ankle instability and in badminton players, report better balance after six to eight weeks of exercises with glasses. A meta-analysis of seven trials speaks of preliminary evidence (Luo et al., 2025), another notes a higher risk of bias in these studies (Majelan et al., 2026).

Are there risks with stroboscopic glasses?

The studies report them poorly: out of 27, only three describe active monitoring (Li, Xiao and Xiao, 2026). The risk pathways mentioned are disorientation, degraded vision during a movement, cognitive fatigue and photosensitivity. In elite rugby players, the load on the knee increases under glasses during changes of direction (Lin et al., 2026).

Do you need medical advice before working with stroboscopic glasses?

At the slightest visual warning sign, double vision, persistent blur, headaches during effort or dizziness, the athlete first sees an ophthalmologist, then an orthoptist or an optometrist depending on the country. LabO RNP is neither medical nor paramedical, and is added as a complement to a care pathway, never in its place.

Method. Inventory of 50 studies on stroboscopy, built on November 3, 2026 from PubMed and our reading notes. 45 publications are cited, two of them outside the inventory: the second part of a trial in the inventory and a boxing trial found through a complementary search. Set aside: three references without a usable abstract (including a student report and a pilot study in hockey), a methodological article devoted to concussion (outside our scope), a pilot of three goalkeepers versus three controls with no sport measure, a 2026 meta-analysis awaiting full re-reading, and a duplicate (the same study published online in 2023 then in a volume in 2025). Identifiers verified against the PubMed record on November 3, 2026; the study without a PMID is cited by its DOI, verified.

Sources

• Appelbaum LG, Schroeder JE, Cain MS, Mitroff SR (2011). Improved Visual Cognition through Stroboscopic Training. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 276. PMID 22059078. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00276

• Appelbaum LG, Cain MS, Schroeder JE, Darling EF, Mitroff SR (2012). Stroboscopic visual training improves information encoding in short-term memory. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(8), 1681-1691. PMID 22810559. doi:10.3758/s13414-012-0344-6

• Beavan A, Hanke L, Spielmann J, Skorski S, Mayer J, Meyer T, Fransen J (2021). The effect of stroboscopic vision on performance in a football specific assessment. Science and Medicine in Football, 5(4), 317-322. PMID 35077302. doi:10.1080/24733938.2020.1862420

• Diao X, Wei R, Cao J (2026). The effects of 12 weeks of Stroboscopic Visual Training (SVT) combined with agility training on the balance and change of direction performance in college-aged female soccer players. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 18(1), 220. PMID 41749382. doi:10.1186/s13102-026-01623-x

• Dingirdan Gultekinler B, Uzlasir S, Işıkdemir E, Bayrakcı Tunay V, Wikstrom EA (2025). The effects of stroboscopic vision training on physical performance in athletes: a systematic review. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 18(1), 78. PMID 41419922. doi:10.1186/s13102-025-01459-x

• Dingirdan Gultekinler B, Uzlasir S, Tunay VB (2026). Integrating stroboscopic visual perturbation into a neuromuscular warm-up in adolescent male basketball players: effects on cognitive function, physical performance, and postural stability, a randomized controlled trial. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 18(1), 303. PMID 42135790. doi:10.1186/s13102-026-01748-z

• Fortes LS, Faro H, Faubert J, Freitas-Júnior CG, Lima-Junior D, Almeida SS (2025). Repeated stroboscopic vision training improves anticipation skill without changing perceptual-cognitive skills in soccer players. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 32(4), 1123-1137 (online in 2023). PMID 37552715. doi:10.1080/23279095.2023.2243358

• Fransen J (2024). There is No Supporting Evidence for a Far Transfer of General Perceptual or Cognitive Training to Sports Performance. Sports Medicine, 54(11), 2717-2724. PMID 38907178. doi:10.1007/s40279-024-02060-x

• Guo J, Zhao L, Liu G, Li H, Wu J (2025). Stroboscopic training effects on athletic performance and cognitive function across populations, purposes, and skill types: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 7, 1705693. PMID 41458106. doi:10.3389/fspor.2025.1705693

• Heidarnia E, Zarei M, Grooms DR, Barghi TS (2026). Neurocognitive training with visual perturbation improves dual-task hop performance in male athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 18(1), 527. PMID 42947260. doi:10.1186/s13102-026-01932-1

• Hülsdünker T, Rentz C, Ruhnow D, Käsbauer H, Strüder HK, Mierau A (2019). The Effect of 4-Week Stroboscopic Training on Visual Function and Sport-Specific Visuomotor Performance in Top-Level Badminton Players. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 14(3), 343-350. PMID 30160560. doi:10.1123/ijspp.2018-0302

• Hülsdünker T, Gunasekara N, Mierau A (2021). Short- and Long-Term Stroboscopic Training Effects on Visuomotor Performance in Elite Youth Sports. Part 1: Reaction and Behavior. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 53(5), 960-972. PMID 33060548. doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000002541

• Hülsdünker T, Gunasekara N, Mierau A (2021). Short- and Long-Term Stroboscopic Training Effects on Visuomotor Performance in Elite Youth Sports. Part 2: Brain-Behavior Mechanisms. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 53(5), 973-985. PMID 33060549. doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000002543

• Kim KM, Estudillo-Martínez MD, Castellote-Caballero Y, Estepa-Gallego A, Cruz-Díaz D (2021). Short-Term Effects of Balance Training with Stroboscopic Vision for Patients with Chronic Ankle Instability: A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(10), 5364. PMID 34069907. doi:10.3390/ijerph18105364

• Li G, Ling Q, Shi Z, Xiong Z (2026). Perceptual-cognitive adaptation under intermittent visual-information constraints: A scoping review of stroboscopic visual training for motor skill and functional performance. Acta Psychologica, 271, 108082. PMID 42962396. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.108082

• Li J, Xiao Y, Xiao S (2026). Safety of stroboscopic visual training in athletes: a mini-review and proposed framework for adverse-event reporting. Frontiers in Physiology, 17, 1924867. PMID 42920879. doi:10.3389/fphys.2026.1924867

• Li Q, Yan Z, Liu R, Wu J, Yang H (2026). Stroboscopic visual training in sport: a structured narrative review of effects, applications, and potential neurophysiological mechanisms. PeerJ, 14, e21740. PMID 42828323. doi:10.7717/peerj.21740

• Li Y, Li S, Yang J, Hao Y (2026). The effects of stroboscopic visual training on coordination, change-of-direction, and decision-making performance in collegiate basketball players. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, 1750065. PMID 41788264. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1750065 (cited as an example, not retained as evidence)

• Lin L, Chen H, Huang X, Zhong Q, Xue S, Li T, Liang Y (2026). Acute biomechanical responses to stroboscopic vision during change-of-direction tasks in elite rugby athletes. Frontiers in Physiology, 17, 1900961. PMID 42774014. doi:10.3389/fphys.2026.1900961

• Liu S, Ferris LM, Hilbig S, et al. (2020). Dynamic vision training transfers positively to batting practice performance among collegiate baseball batters. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 51, 101759. No PMID. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101759

• Lu M, Zhai Y, Peng H, Cao J, Yang Y, Chen L (2025). Effects of balance training combined with stroboscopic visual training on balance ability in college-aged male soccer players. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 17(1), 207. PMID 40682165. doi:10.1186/s13102-025-01255-7

• Luo Y, Cao Y, Pan X, Li S, Koh D, Shi Y (2025). Effects of stroboscopic visual training on reaction time and movement accuracy in collegiate athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 25151. PMID 40646137. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-10393-4

• Luo Y, Zhang X, Li S, Cao Y, Pan X, Koh D (2025). Stroboscopic visual training combined with balance exercises for chronic ankle instability: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 21(1), 44. PMID 41413570. doi:10.1186/s13018-025-06353-3

• Majelan AS, Shahani O, Keivani A, Armanfar M, Picot B (2026). Effects of Balance Training Combined With Either Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation or Stroboscopic Vision Training on Balance Performance in Individuals With Chronic Ankle Instability: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 19(3), e70210. PMID 42762494. doi:10.1002/jfa2.70210

• Ren Y, Zhang J, Sun X, Qi F, Guo F (2025). The effects of stroboscopic visual training on human cognitive function and motor performance: a systematic review. Frontiers in Physiology, 16, 1708783. PMID 41394926. doi:10.3389/fphys.2025.1708783

• Robey NJ, Buchholz KO, Murphy SP, Smith JD, Heise GD (2021). Do Athletes With a Reconstructed Anterior Cruciate Ligament Respond Differently Than Controls to Visual Challenges When Dynamic Postural Stability is Assessed? Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 37(6), 611-618. PMID 34872076. doi:10.1123/jab.2021-0302

• Smith TQ, Mitroff SR (2012). Stroboscopic Training Enhances Anticipatory Timing. International Journal of Exercise Science, 5(4), 344-353. PMID 27182391. doi:10.70252/OTSW1297

• Strainchamps P, Ostermann M, Mierau A, Hülsdünker T (2023). Stroboscopic Eyewear Applied During Warm-Up Does Not Provide Additional Benefits to the Sport-Specific Reaction Speed in Highly Trained Table Tennis Athletes. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 18(10), 1126-1131. PMID 37321564. doi:10.1123/ijspp.2022-0426

• Uzlaşır S, Özdıraz KY, Dağ O, Tunay VB (2021). The effects of stroboscopic balance training on cortical activities in athletes with chronic ankle instability. Physical Therapy in Sport, 50, 50-58. PMID 33865218. doi:10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.03.014

• Vater C, Strasburger H (2021). Topical Review: The Top Five Peripheral Vision Tools in Sport. Optometry and Vision Science, 98(7), 704-722. PMID 34285176. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001732

• Vera J, Cantó-Cerdán M, García-Ramos A, Redondo B (2026). Acute and long-term effects of stroboscopic training on sport performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Sports Sciences, 44(5), 604-615. PMID 41334595. doi:10.1080/02640414.2025.2598176

• Vera J, Lara P, Ruiz-Pérez AF, Zwierko T, García-Ramos A, Redondo B (2026). Seeing less to perform better: stroboscopic stimulation effects on padel volley accuracy and reactive agility. PeerJ, 14, e21038. PMID 41940396. doi:10.7717/peerj.21038

• Wang R, Li S, Wu Y, Liu H, Zhang Q (2025). Effects of stroboscopic visual training on reaction time and decision-making ability in athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1697425. PMID 41333302. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1697425

• Wang Y, Wang Q, Bao H, Dong X, Cai K, Chen A (2026). A systematic review and three-level meta-analysis of the effects of stroboscopic training on sport-specific performance. Journal of Sports Sciences, 44(4), 460-476. PMID 41289003. doi:10.1080/02640414.2025.2592441

• Wang Y, Lv H, Lu Z, Jiang Z, Jiang G, Wang Y (2026). Stroboscopic balance training enhances dynamic stability and postural control in collegiate badminton players: a randomized controlled trial. PeerJ, 14, e21464. PMID 42376045. doi:10.7717/peerj.21464

• Weng C, Gao D, Dong X, Xu S, Jiang J, Wang J (2026). Effects of stroboscopic vision training on visuomotor reaction and soccer-specific reactive agility in male collegiate soccer players: a randomized controlled intervention study. Frontiers in Physiology, 17, 1897512. PMID 42548645. doi:10.3389/fphys.2026.1897512

• Weng C, Gao D, Dong X, et al. (2026). Visual, visuomotor, and kinesthetic abilities in football players: their relationship with sport-specific performance and trainability. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 20, 1930426. PMID 42707768. doi:10.3389/fnins.2026.1930426

• Wilkins L, Gray R (2015). Effects of stroboscopic visual training on visual attention, motion perception, and catching performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 121(1), 57-79. PMID 26126135. doi:10.2466/22.25.PMS.121c11x0

• Xiao Y, Gao D, Zhuang M, Long Y, Wei Q, Wang D, Zhang P, Zhao Z, Wang Q, Zhang X (2026). The effects of stroboscopic vision training on sports vision ability performance and punching performance in female boxers. Frontiers in Physiology, 17, 1856441. PMID 42344271. doi:10.3389/fphys.2026.1856441

• Yazgan EA, Özdinçler AR, Kılıç BB (2026). Stroboscopic Versus Traditional Balance Training in Female Volleyball Players With Chronic Ankle Instability: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Sports Health. PMID 42770538. doi:10.1177/19417381261483200

• Yu P, Yu Y, Sun J, Chen Y, Zhou Z, Tang Y (2026). Effect of visual disruption on the lower limb kinematic and kinetic characteristics in athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 14, 1767092. PMID 42339465. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2026.1767092

• Zwierko M, Jedziniak W, Popowczak M, Rokita A (2023). Effects of in-situ stroboscopic training on visual, visuomotor and reactive agility in youth volleyball players. PeerJ, 11, e15213. PMID 37250711. doi:10.7717/peerj.15213

• Zwierko M, Jedziniak W, Popowczak M, Rokita A (2024). Effects of six-week stroboscopic training program on visuomotor reaction speed in goal-directed movements in young volleyball players: a study focusing on agility performance. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 16(1), 59. PMID 38424539. doi:10.1186/s13102-024-00848-y

• Zwierko T, Jedziniak W, Domaradzki J, Zwierko M, Opolska M, Lubiński W (2024). Electrophysiological Evidence of Stroboscopic Training in Elite Handball Players: Visual Evoked Potentials Study. Journal of Human Kinetics, 90, 57-69. PMID 38380298. doi:10.5114/jhk/169443

• Zwierko T, Tapia V, Vera J, Redondo B, Morenas-Aguilar MD, García-Ramos A (2024). Enhancing reactive agility in soccer: The impact of stroboscopic eyewear during warm-up across fatigued and non-fatigued conditions. European Journal of Sport Science, 24(12), 1798-1808. PMID 39578413. doi:10.1002/ejsc.12224

By the LabO RNP team