Vision in basketball: free throw, decision-making and visual training, what 98 studies say

In brief. In basketball, gaze is measured mostly at the shot: a stable fixation on the front of the rim goes with success, and it degrades under anxiety or intense effort. Visual training improves the trained task; no analyzed trial measures a gain in an official game. 98 studies analyzed. Updated November 3, 2026.

Hello to you, the movement professional,

A video of a free throw stops before the ball leaves the shooter's hands. Who already knows whether it will go in? In the experiment by Aglioti's team, professional basketball players predicted it earlier and more accurately than coaches and sports journalists, who had nonetheless watched as much basketball, and than novices (Aglioti et al., 2008). The gap appears before the ball is released: the players read the kinematics of the body. And only the players show a motor activation specific to missed shots, as if their motor system were replaying the movement they are watching.

Reading a shot in basketball therefore goes through a body that knows how to shoot. For you, who prepare players, three questions follow: where does the eye go at the free throw, what does the reading of the game rest on, and what does visual training really change. The most serious objection comes from a 2026 systematic review on perceptual-cognitive training of young basketball players: 14 reports retained out of 973 references, 11 cohorts, and not enough to establish a general gain in decision-making, a lasting learning effect, or a transfer to competition (Li et al., 2026a).

Vision in basketball: quiet eye, last fixation and peripheral vision

The quiet eye is the last fixation on the target before the movement is triggered. At the free throw, it is the eye resting on the rim while the arms get ready. It was described in basketball as early as the 1990s (Vickers, 1996), and a review already counted more than 70 articles on the subject over fifteen years (Vine et al., 2014). The mechanism, the other sports and the underlying debates are in our article on the quiet eye and precision; here, we stay with basketball.

The most useful framework for reading what follows comes from Klostermann's team: a stable foveal fixation serves precision, while peripheral vision serves complex situations in which several things must be monitored at once (Klostermann et al., 2019a). The shot calls for the first, reading the game for the second. Between two fixations, the eye jumps by saccadic eye movements, and several studies place the gap between experts and amateurs there. In research on vision and sports performance, basketball is among the four most represented sports, along with baseball, football and cricket (Lochhead et al., 2024).

The basic visual functions of the basketball player

Among 33 men who went through an optometric assessment, semi-professional basketball players have, compared with sedentary people, a closer near point of convergence, faster fusional vergence and better eye-hand coordination (Vera et al., 2020b). The picture changes as soon as sports are compared with each other. Among 52 participants, only visual acuity differs between groups, and basketball players have neither better peripheral vision nor better stereoacuity (Nascimento et al., 2025). Among 55 Spanish professionals, 14 of them basketball players, dynamic acuity is the same in football, basketball and water polo (Quevedo-Junyent and Argilés, 2024).

The clearest differences concern eye control. Elite university basketball players make 4.8% errors on the antisaccade task, against 13.7% for bench players and 13.9% for non-athletes (Fujiwara et al., 2009). In club basketball players, the earliest peak of saccadic reaction times falls around 170 ms, against 190 ms in non-athletes (Kunita and Fujiwara, 2022). Among 60 basketball and volleyball players aged 16 to 18, the number and speed of saccades explain part of the agility of the female basketball players (Popowczak and Zwierko, 2025). These measurements describe a profile; they do not say that training the antisaccade makes a better player.

Gaze at the free throw and the shot: what eye trackers show

Read as a whole, the table shows an expert who fixates less, for longer, and rather on the front of the rim. Pressure and severe effort degrade this fixation along with success, which fits what we know about the movement under fatigue. And the quiet eye is not a magic number: it separates neither ages nor levels in Fischer, it does not predict success on its own in the youths in Han, and it is its regularity, more than its duration, that counts in Mizusaki. The jump shot adds a nuance that the free throw hides: under defense, the eye keeps guiding the shot until release.

Reading the game: anticipation, fakes and pick and roll

In one-on-one play, during the catch and the dribble, novices follow the ball with their eyes while expert defenders mostly fixate the attacker's head; at the moment of the shot, both groups look at the ball. The coaches surveyed, for their part, teach looking at the torso (Meyer et al., 2022a). Against shot fakes, successful anticipations rely on the hips and legs, failed ones on the ball and the head (Meyer et al., 2022b). In another study, experts also look at the body rather than the ball (Li et al., 2023), and experienced players beat chance only at normal video speed, while looking at the lower body (Uchida et al., 2014). Skilled defenders are faster in one-on-one, with no specialized anticipation demonstrated (Fujii et al., 2014).

The head fake fools everyone. The effect is the same size in basketball players as in others, but a fake just before erases it in basketball players (Weigelt et al., 2017). It arises in both perception and the choice of response (Polzien et al., 2020). A review on fakes in combat and interactive sports, basketball included, concludes that none of its three underlying questions is settled (Güldenpenning et al., 2017).

On the court, in three-on-three with a screen and a roll, peripheral vision seems to serve deciding and central vision acting (van Maarseveen et al., 2018a). In the laboratory, the expert advantage withstands blur, and central blur hinders more than peripheral blur (Ryu et al., 2015). Experts also anticipate what follows in a play system from schematic images, which non-experts do not (Gorman et al., 2011). This split between a vision for perceiving and a vision for acting recalls the ventral and dorsal pathways, as a reading framework and not as proof.

Experts versus novices: visual search, pressure and the brain

Visual search changes with complexity. Experts make more and longer fixations on the informative areas (Jin et al., 2023), or fewer and shorter fixations in another task (Gou et al., 2026b). Among 25 experts and 25 novices, nothing separates them in a simple task; in a complex task, 1,623 ms against 2,077 ms and 5.47 fixations against 9.63 (Yu et al., 2026). Under time pressure, experts stay stable while non-athletes drop off (Guo and Wang, 2025). In skilled players, the accuracy advantage is limited to structured game configurations (Xu et al., 2026). These gaps shrink when studies are pooled: across 26 studies comparing experts, intermediates and novices in football, basketball and volleyball, the fixation-duration gap by level rests on limited evidence only, and the gap in response accuracy is no longer significant after correction for publication bias (Ma et al., 2026).

On the brain side, experts have a more stable fixation and activate the inferior parietal lobule and the inferior frontal gyrus more in functional MRI (Wu et al., 2013), which points back to the posterior parietal cortex. According to a narrative review, lobules VI and VII of the cerebellar vermis are larger in elite basketball players (Park et al., 2018). Mental fatigue slows mainly novices (Li et al., 2026b), and anodal transcranial electrical stimulation erases its effect on decision-making in 20 players (Fortes et al., 2022). Thirteen internationals beat fifteen controls in memory, selective attention and prediction, and do worse in dynamic balance (Kioumourtzoglou et al., 1998).

Tracking several players at once: multiple object tracking

Among 12 NBA players, the multiple object tracking score is linked to assists (r = 0.78), steals (r = 0.77) and the assist-to-turnover ratio (r = 0.78), more weakly and without reaching significance to turnovers (r = 0.49), and reaction time on lights is linked to nothing (Mangine et al., 2014). Elite players beat intermediates and non-athletes only at three and four targets (Qiu et al., 2018), with lower activation of the left frontal eye field and the anterior intraparietal sulcus (Qiu et al., 2019). The advantage appears only at high speeds (Jin et al., 2020). Among 48 female players, the experts beat the novices: 64.6% against 55.7% in tracking and 91.6% against 84.5% in decision-making (Gou and Li, 2023); better tracking goes with shorter and fewer fixations during decision-making (Gou and Li, 2025). Postural instability makes tracking drop, and the advantage of team-sport players over sedentary people (d = 0.96 and 0.94 on the two most stable settings) disappears on the most unstable one (Zwierko et al., 2022); mental fatigue, for its part, changes nothing in tracking (Faro et al., 2023). The paradigm itself is detailed in our article on multiple object tracking.

Training the basketball player's vision: the trials one by one

Most of these trials improve what they train. Gaze instructions at the free throw hold under pressure in Vine and under defense in Vickers, but novices relapse as soon as the situation changes. Aiming at the front of the rim takes nine weeks to show in Gou, which gives an idea of the learning time for a visual cue. Practice variability changes nothing in the gaze in Czyż. And external attentional focus goes through the eye, in Al-Abood as in Asadi.

A 2026 stroboscopic trial reports effect sizes of 4.009 and 3.943 with 14 players per group (Li et al., 2026c). Effect sizes of this order are very unusual in training trials; it is cited here as an example of a result awaiting replication, not as proof. The randomized, registered trial by Dingirdan Gultekinler, on a warm-up for young basketball players, finds a much narrower gain. A recent narrative review also stresses the scarcity of basketball-specific stroboscopic studies: the parameters it proposes come from other sports and remain to be validated in this one (Kang and Cao, 2026).

From the test to the court: what transfers, what stays in the exercise

On the trained task itself, the gain is almost always there: reaction on lights, object tracking, fixations at the free throw. One step further, on structured basketball tests, it still exists: shots under defense in Vickers, decision-making on the court in Pagé, dribbling and specific tests in Lucia and Hassan. Far transfer, the official game, is measured by no controlled trial in this list.

Null or mixed results count just as much. Panchuk 2018: nothing significant in small-sided games, and in the girls only the control improves there. Zemková 2010: reaction times do not move. Czyż 2019: no gap between practices. Dingirdan Gultekinler 2026: most measures improve just as much without the strobe. Hassan 2025: the control improves too. Rienhoff 2013: accuracy carries over from one task to the other, the quiet eye does not. And in Mangine, reaction on lights is linked to no game statistic while object tracking is linked to assists, which should give pause before building visual work on reaction alone.

The reviews point the same way. Across 19 eye-tracking studies in basketball, guided gaze helps novices but adds little for skilled players (Alemanno et al., 2025). Across 22 studies and 1,113 team-sport athletes, basketball included, specific performance is linked to object tracking (r = 0.54), attention (r = 0.39), visual search (r = 0.36) and reaction times (r = −0.31 and −0.37), not to depth perception (r = 0.09) (Yang et al., 2026). Across 12 studies and 493 participants from several sports, virtual reality looks promising, and its transfer to the field remains an open question (Richlan et al., 2023). And the review by Li, devoted to young players, is decisive: cognitive-motor interventions give the most consistent effects, the evidence on gaze control rests on a small non-randomized cohort, and anticipation gives mixed results. The map of the evidence in sports vision places these figures among the other sports.

Links between the studies

The description of the shot cross-checks well: the expert fixates less and for longer, and this gaze deteriorates under pressure. The training trials, for their part, answer each other far less. Six studies on gaze at the shot (Zhao 2023, 2024a, 2024b and 2024c, Zhang 2026a and 2026b) come from the same group of authors, which limits the independence of the replications. On the decision side, the line Ryu, van Maarseveen, Klostermann is consistent: periphery to read, fovea to act. To compare with another sport of passes and shots, read our article on vision in handball.

Promises that can be kept and promises to refuse

Established: at the shot, the expert concentrates their gaze on the rim with fewer fixations, and anxiety as well as severe effort degrade this gaze along with success; the expert player reads the opponent's body rather than the ball. Debated: that the duration of the quiet eye is the right measure, when its regularity seems to matter more; that virtual reality carries over to the court, shown by a single university trial. Extrapolation: that visual training outside basketball, on lights, strobes or object tracking, wins points or games.

No study allows us to claim that a player who lengthens their quiet eye will make more free throws in a game. To put it to the test, you would need a randomized trial in skilled players, with gaze training at the free throw on one side, the same volume of throws without gaze instruction on the other, and the percentage in official games over a season as the criterion. If the gap is zero, the idea that the shooter's gaze can be usefully trained no longer holds. Nobody has run it yet. The same logic applies to representative design: a test without a defender says little about the defended shot.

Who checks the basketball player's eyes before visual training

Vera showed it at the line: losing vision in one eye, or blurring it, costs about 8 to 9% of success. If your athlete reports double vision, persistent blur, headaches during exertion or dizziness, visual training waits. They see an ophthalmologist first, then an orthoptist in France, or an optometrist in Switzerland or the United States. LabO RNP is neither medical nor paramedical, and comes in addition to a care pathway, never in its place. LabO RNP works with optometrists; the curriculum was built with them.

What the shooter's eye says about the sensorimotor loop

The eyes are an entry point. What LabO RNP teaches is the whole sensorimotor loop: how what the athlete perceives organizes what they do. Basketball illustrates it twice. The shooter keeps the eye on the rim while the body produces the movement, and this fixation comes undone when effort or pressure rise. The defender reads the attacker's hips and their body responds before the ball does. If you are wondering what place to give the eyes before a team's training, our article on oculomotor exercises in the warm-up takes stock.

What basketball coaches ask about vision

Where should a basketball player look at the free throw?

Experts fixate the front or the top of the rim, with fewer and longer fixations than novices. Among 48 amateurs, aiming at the front of the rim ended up improving the percentage, but it took nine weeks (36.39 against 30.14%). The regularity of this last fixation from one shot to the next seems to matter more than its duration.

Does the quiet eye make you shoot better in games?

Trials show that quiet eye training protects success under pressure or under defense, in the laboratory or in practice. None has measured the percentage in an official game. A review of 19 eye-tracking studies in basketball notes that guided gaze helps novices but adds little for skilled players. The promise therefore remains to be demonstrated.

Does fatigue make you miss free throws?

Among ten players, only severe effort, around 86% of maximal heart rate, lowered accuracy by 19% and the quiet eye by 45%. Anxiety also shortens the quiet eye. Fatigue and pressure damage the gaze along with the movement, without our yet knowing which drags the other along.

Are reactive lights and stroboscopic glasses useful in basketball?

They improve the reaction and agility tests they train, but some trials have no control group and, in others, the control improves too. In NBA players, reaction time on lights is linked to no game statistic. A randomized, registered trial, with stroboscopic glasses during the warm-up of young basketball players, finds a gain on only two components of reactive agility.

Does virtual reality improve a basketball player's decision-making?

One university trial shows a decision-making gain measured on the court, including on untrained systems. Another, with immersive video in elite youths, finds nothing significant in small-sided games. A review of 12 studies, all sports combined, judges the lead promising and leaves open the question of transfer to the field.

Is a visual assessment needed before training a basketball player's vision?

Yes, as soon as there is double vision, persistent blur, headaches during exertion or dizziness: ophthalmologist first, then orthoptist in France, or optometrist in Switzerland or the United States. LabO RNP is neither medical nor paramedical, and comes in addition to a care pathway, never in its place.

A shooter's gaze can be read on an eye tracker in a few throws; what visual training brings them could only be read in games, and no trial has yet gone that far.

👉 I want to learn how to connect what my player sees to what their body produces.

By the LabO RNP team

Method. Inventory of the basketball studies of the vision silo built on November 3, 2026 from PubMed and the LabO RNP vault notes (14 lines), completed by a targeted PubMed search (103 lines), for 117 references examined. 98 studies retained here for their direct link to gaze at the shot, decision-making, visual functions and visual training of the basketball player. Set aside: an opinion article without data (Getz, 1978) and a study without an available abstract (Morris, 1977). The other references, redundant or devoted to officiating (covered in a dedicated satellite), are not reproduced. One stroboscopic trial (Li et al., 2026c) is cited as an example of unusual effect sizes awaiting replication, never as proof. Each PMID and each DOI was verified on the PubMed record on November 3, 2026.

Sources

• Aglioti SM, Cesari P, Romani M, Urgesi C (2008). Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players. Nat Neurosci, 11(9), 1109-16. PMID 19160510. doi:10.1038/nn.2182

• Al-Abood SA, Bennett SJ, Hernandez FM, Ashford D, Davids K (2002). Effect of verbal instructions and image size on visual search strategies in basketball free throw shooting. J Sports Sci, 20(3), 271-8. PMID 11999481. doi:10.1080/026404102317284817

• Alemanno M, Di Pompeo I, Marcaccio M, Canini D, Curcio G, Migliore S (2025). From Gaze to Game: A Systematic Review of Eye-Tracking Applications in Basketball. Brain Sci, 15(4). PMID 40309899. doi:10.3390/brainsci15040421

• Asadi A, Daneshfar A, Maleki B, Aiken CA (2023). Effects of attentional focus and gaze instruction during observational learning of a basketball free-throw. Hum Mov Sci, 87, 103038. PMID 36435171. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2022.103038

• Asadi A, Daneshfar A, Saeedpour-Parizi MR, Aiken CA, Smiley A (2025). Detecting optimal gaze behavior of successful basketball free throwing via machine learning system. Hum Mov Sci, 102, 103381. PMID 40516144. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2025.103381

• Badau D, Stoica AM, Litoi MF, Badau A, Duta D, Hantau CG, Sabau AM, Oancea BM, Ciocan CV, Fleancu JL, Gozu B (2023). The Impact of Peripheral Vision on Manual Reaction Time Using Fitlight Technology for Handball, Basketball and Volleyball Players. Bioengineering (Basel), 10(6). PMID 37370628. doi:10.3390/bioengineering10060697

• Badau D, Steff N, Badau A, Stoica M (2025). Enhancing Lower-Limb Simple and Choice Reaction Time and Spatial Orientation in Junior Basketball Players by Implementing Fitlight Technology in Sports Training. Percept Mot Skills, 132(6), 1392-1417. PMID 40446814. doi:10.1177/00315125251347793

• Czyż SH, Zvonař M, Borysiuk Z, Nykodým J, Oleśniewicz P (2019). Gaze Behavior in Basketball Free Throws Developed in Constant and Variable Practice. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 16(20). PMID 31614871. doi:10.3390/ijerph16203875

• Dingirdan Gultekinler B, Uzlasir S, Tunay VB (2026). Integrating stroboscopic visual perturbation into a neuromuscular warm-up in adolescent male basketball players: effects on cognitive function, physical performance, and postural stability-a randomized controlled trial. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil, 18(1). PMID 42135790. doi:10.1186/s13102-026-01748-z

• Faro H, Cavalcante Silva D, Barbosa BT, Costa YPD, Freitas-Junior CG, de Lima-Junior D, Faubert J, Fortes LS (2023). Young Basketball Players' Multiple Object Tracking Skills Were Unaffected by Stroop-Induced Mental Fatigue. Percept Mot Skills, 130(5), 2161-2176. PMID 37464728. doi:10.1177/00315125231189091

• Fischer L, Rienhoff R, Tirp J, Baker J, Strauss B, Schorer J (2015). Retention of quiet eye in older skilled basketball players. J Mot Behav, 47(5), 407-14. PMID 25675272. doi:10.1080/00222895.2014.1003780

• Fortes LS, Ferreira MEC, Faro H, Penna EM, Almeida SS (2022). Brain Stimulation Over the Motion-Sensitive Midtemporal Area Reduces Deleterious Effects of Mental Fatigue on Perceptual-Cognitive Skills in Basketball Players. J Sport Exerc Psychol, 44(4), 272-285. PMID 35613846. doi:10.1123/jsep.2021-0281

• Fujii K, Shinya M, Yamashita D, Oda S, Kouzaki M (2014). Superior reaction to changing directions for skilled basketball defenders but not linked with specialised anticipation. Eur J Sport Sci, 14(3), 209-16. PMID 23534908. doi:10.1080/17461391.2013.780098

• Fujiwara K, Kiyota N, Maekawa M, Kunita K, Kiyota T, Maeda K (2009). Saccades and prefrontal hemodynamics in basketball players. Int J Sports Med, 30(9), 647-51. PMID 19569008. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1220732

• Giancamilli F, Galli F, Chirico A, Fegatelli D, Mallia L, Palombi T, Lucidi F (2022). High-Pressure Game Conditions Affect Quiet Eye Depending on the Player's Expertise: Evidence from the Basketball Three-Point Shot. Brain Sci, 12(2). PMID 35204049. doi:10.3390/brainsci12020286

• Gorman AD, Abernethy B, Farrow D (2011). Investigating the anticipatory nature of pattern perception in sport. Mem Cognit, 39(5), 894-901. PMID 21264636. doi:10.3758/s13421-010-0067-7

• Gou Q, Li S, Wang R (2022). Study on eye movement characteristics and intervention of basketball shooting skill. PeerJ, 10, e14301. PMID 36340200. doi:10.7717/peerj.14301

• Gou Q, Li S (2023). Study on the correlation between basketball players' multiple-object tracking ability and sports decision-making. PLoS One, 18(4), e0283965. PMID 37018189. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0283965

• Gou Q, Li S (2025). Study on the correlation between multiple object tracking ability and eye- tracking characteristics in sports decision making among basketball players. PeerJ, 13, e19984. PMID 40949726. doi:10.7717/peerj.19984

• Gou Q, Liu Y, Li S (2026a). Effects of multiple object tracking training on visual attention and sports decision-making in novice female basketball players: evidence from EyeLink-EEG synchronization. PeerJ, 14, e21711. PMID 42732286. doi:10.7717/peerj.21711

• Gou QF, Liu YF, Li SN (2026b). Comparison of visual search features in expert versus novice collegiate females during basketball decision making. Sci Rep, 16(1). PMID 42056481. doi:10.1038/s41598-026-51002-2

• Guo Z, Wang Q (2025). The impact of time pressure on decision-making and visual search characteristics in basketball players. Front Psychol, 16, 1660732. PMID 40880819. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1660732

• Güldenpenning I, Kunde W, Weigelt M (2017). How to Trick Your Opponent: A Review Article on Deceptive Actions in Interactive Sports. Front Psychol, 8, 917. PMID 28620336. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00917

• Han M, Gómez-Carmona CD, Conte D, Calvo JL (2026). Developmental Differences in Gaze Behaviors and Performance During Basketball Free Throws in Youth Athletes. Sports (Basel), 14(3). PMID 41893596. doi:10.3390/sports14030105

• Hassan AK, Alhumaid MM, Hamad BE (2022). The Effect of Using Reactive Agility Exercises with the FITLIGHT Training System on the Speed of Visual Reaction Time and Dribbling Skill of Basketball Players. Sports (Basel), 10(11). PMID 36422946. doi:10.3390/sports10110176

• Hassan AK (2025). FITLIGHT Training and Its Influence on Visual-Motor Reactions and Dribbling Speed in Female Basketball Players: Prospective Evaluation Study. JMIR Serious Games, 13, e70519. PMID 40614262. doi:10.2196/70519

• Jin P, Li X, Ma B, Guo H, Zhang Z, Mao L (2020). Dynamic visual attention characteristics and their relationship to match performance in skilled basketball players. PeerJ, 8, e9803. PMID 32879809. doi:10.7717/peerj.9803

• Jin P, Ge Z, Fan T (2023). Research on visual search behaviors of basketball players at different levels of sports expertise. Sci Rep, 13(1), 1406. PMID 36697486. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-28754-2

• Kang H, Cao X (2026). Stroboscopic visual training in basketball: a narrative review integrating cross-sport evidence and a hypothetical framework based on the information processing model. Front Psychol, 17, 1876582. PMID 42403610. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1876582

• Kioumourtzoglou E, Derri V, Tzetzis G, Theodorakis Y (1998). Cognitive, perceptual, and motor abilities in skilled basketball performance. Percept Mot Skills, 86(3 Pt 1), 771-86. PMID 9656269. doi:10.2466/pms.1998.86.3.771

• Klostermann A, Panchuk D, Farrow D (2018). Perception-action coupling in complex game play: Exploring the quiet eye in contested basketball jump shots. J Sports Sci, 36(9), 1054-1060. PMID 28707506. doi:10.1080/02640414.2017.1355063

• Klostermann A (2019b). Especial skill vs. quiet eye duration in basketball free throw: Evidence for the inhibition of competing task solutions. Eur J Sport Sci, 19(7), 964-971. PMID 30724705. doi:10.1080/17461391.2019.1571113

• Klostermann A, Vater C, Kredel R, Hossner EJ (2019a). Perception and Action in Sports. On the Functionality of Foveal and Peripheral Vision. Front Sports Act Living, 1, 66. PMID 33344989. doi:10.3389/fspor.2019.00066

• Ktistakis I, Zacharakis E, Terzis G, Kostopoulos N, Stavrou NAM (2026). Gaze fixation parameters in basketball: examining the link to anxiety, self-talk, and emotional responses in free-throw shooting. Front Psychol, 17, 1730500. PMID 41756477. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1730500

• Kunita K, Fujiwara K (2022). Influence of sports experience on distribution of pro-saccade reaction time under gap condition. J Physiol Anthropol, 41(1), 4. PMID 35081976. doi:10.1186/s40101-022-00277-1

• Lalaj A, Shpata V (2026). Improvements in Static Balance Following an Oculomotor Exercise Program in Athletes. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact, 26(3), 355-368. PMID 42675939. doi:10.22540/JMNI-26-355

• Li M, Luo Y, Li J, Zeng Y (2026a). Perceptual-cognitive training in basketball: effects on cognitive-motor performance, decision-making, and sport-specific transfer across youth players. Front Pediatr, 14, 1972276. PMID 42846035. doi:10.3389/fped.2026.1972276

• Li M, Zhang Y, Zheng Z (2026b). Effects of mental fatigue on basketball decision-making and visual search behavior. Front Psychol, 17, 1837100. PMID 42577226. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1837100

• Li Y, Feng T, Zhang F, Asgher U, Yan B, Peng T (2023). Visual search strategies of performance monitoring used in action anticipation of basketball players. Brain Behav, 13(12), e3298. PMID 37872861. doi:10.1002/brb3.3298

• Li Y, Li S, Yang J, Hao Y (2026c). The effects of stroboscopic visual training on coordination, change-of-direction, and decision-making performance in collegiate basketball players. Front Psychol, 17, 1750065. PMID 41788264. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1750065

• Liu PX, Pan TY, Lin HS, Chu HK, Hu MC (2024). VisionCoach: Design and Effectiveness Study on VR Vision Training for Basketball Passing. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph, 30(10), 6665-6677. PMID 38015694. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2023.3335312

• Lochhead L, Feng J, Laby DM, Appelbaum LG (2024). Visual Performance and Sports: A Scoping Review. J Sport Exerc Psychol, 46(4), 205-217. PMID 38815973. doi:10.1123/jsep.2023-0267

• Lucia S, Bianco V, Boccacci L, Di Russo F (2021). Effects of a Cognitive-Motor Training on Anticipatory Brain Functions and Sport Performance in Semi-Elite Basketball Players. Brain Sci, 12(1). PMID 35053809. doi:10.3390/brainsci12010068

• Ma Y, He A, Huang Z, Finlay MJ, Simpson T, Gao D, Song X, Chen C, Wang D (2026). Attention allocation in team sports: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on eye-tracking. J Sports Sci, 1-14. PMID 42908103. doi:10.1080/02640414.2026.2750668

• Mangine GT, Hoffman JR, Wells AJ, Gonzalez AM, Rogowski JP, Townsend JR, Jajtner AR, Beyer KS, Bohner JD, Pruna GJ, Fragala MS, Stout JR (2014). Visual tracking speed is related to basketball-specific measures of performance in NBA players. J Strength Cond Res, 28(9), 2406-14. PMID 24875429. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000000550

• Meyer J, Fasold F, Schul K, Sonnenschein M, Klatt S (2022a). The Defender's Vision-Gaze Behavior of One-on-One Defenders in Basketball. J Sport Exerc Psychol, 44(2), 127-137. PMID 35245894. doi:10.1123/jsep.2021-0149

• Meyer J, Smeeton NJ, Fasold F, Schul K, Schön T, Klatt S (2022b). Shot deception in basketball: Gaze and anticipation strategy in defence. Hum Mov Sci, 84, 102975. PMID 35820258. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2022.102975

• Minoonejad H, Barati AH, Naderifar H, Heidari B, Kazemi AS, Lashay A (2019). Effect of four weeks of ocular-motor exercises on dynamic visual acuity and stability limit of female basketball players. Gait Posture, 73, 286-290. PMID 31398634. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.06.022

• Mizusaki Y, Kamei M, Ikudome S, Murata M, Mann DL, Nakamoto H (2025). Success in basketball shooting is better explained by less variability in quiet eye duration than the average quiet eye duration itself. Psychol Sport Exerc, 79, 102853. PMID 40194673. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102853

• Nascimento H, Roque A, Martinez-Perez C (2025). Visual Function in Athletes from Different Team Sports and Non-Athlete Controls. Life (Basel), 15(10). PMID 41157291. doi:10.3390/life15101619

• Oudejans RR, van de Langenberg RW, Hutter RI (2002). Aiming at a far target under different viewing conditions: visual control in basketball jump shooting. Hum Mov Sci, 21(4), 457-80. PMID 12450679. doi:10.1016/s0167-9457(02)00116-1

• Oudejans RR, Heubers S, Ruitenbeek JR, Janssen TW (2012). Training visual control in wheelchair basketball shooting. Res Q Exerc Sport, 83(3), 464-9. PMID 22978196. doi:10.1080/02701367.2012.10599881

• Pagé C, Bernier PM, Trempe M (2019). Using video simulations and virtual reality to improve decision-making skills in basketball. J Sports Sci, 37(21), 2403-2410. PMID 31280685. doi:10.1080/02640414.2019.1638193

• Panchuk D, Klusemann MJ, Hadlow SM (2018). Exploring the Effectiveness of Immersive Video for Training Decision-Making Capability in Elite, Youth Basketball Players. Front Psychol, 9, 2315. PMID 30538652. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02315

• Park IS, Lee NJ, Rhyu IJ (2018). Roles of the Declive, Folium, and Tuber Cerebellar Vermian Lobules in Sportspeople. J Clin Neurol, 14(1), 1-7. PMID 29141275. doi:10.3988/jcn.2018.14.1.1

• Piras A (2024b). The timing of vision in basketball three-point shots. Front Psychol, 15, 1458363. PMID 39539305. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1458363

• Piras A, Del Santo F, Meoni A, Raffi M (2024a). Saccades and Microsaccades Coupling During Free-Throw Shots in Basketball Players. J Sport Exerc Psychol, 46(4), 229-237. PMID 39048095. doi:10.1123/jsep.2023-0161

• Piras A (2026). Impact of Shooting Distance on Oculomotor Strategy in Basketball Shooting. Eur J Sport Sci, 26(4), e70156. PMID 41820236. doi:10.1002/ejsc.70156

• Polzien A, Güldenpenning I, Weigelt M (2020). Examining the Perceptual-Cognitive Mechanism of Deceptive Actions in Sports. Exp Psychol, 67(6), 349-363. PMID 33661040. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000503

• Popowczak M, Zwierko T (2025). Effects of Oculomotor Scanning on Agility Performance: Gender and a Type of Team Sport Comparison. J Hum Kinet, 99, 263-274. PMID 41245978. doi:10.5114/jhk/196002

• Qiu F, Pi Y, Liu K, Li X, Zhang J, Wu Y (2018). Influence of sports expertise level on attention in multiple object tracking. PeerJ, 6, e5732. PMID 30280051. doi:10.7717/peerj.5732

• Qiu F, Pi Y, Liu K, Zhu H, Li X, Zhang J, Wu Y (2019). Neural efficiency in basketball players is associated with bidirectional reductions in cortical activation and deactivation during multiple-object tracking task performance. Biol Psychol, 144, 28-36. PMID 30902565. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.03.008

• Quevedo-Junyent L, Argilés M (2024). Influence of trajectory and contrast on dynamic visual acuity in elite team sports players. Perception, 53(7), 437-449. PMID 38646722. doi:10.1177/03010066241248077

• Richlan F, Weiß M, Kastner P, Braid J (2023). Virtual training, real effects: a narrative review on sports performance enhancement through interventions in virtual reality. Front Psychol, 14, 1240790. PMID 37928573. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1240790

• Rienhoff R, Hopwood MJ, Fischer L, Strauss B, Baker J, Schorer J (2013). Transfer of motor and perceptual skills from basketball to darts. Front Psychol, 4, 593. PMID 24062703. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00593

• Rui M, Fernando M, Ricardo G, Martinho DV, Rui M, Moore SA, Coelho-E-Silva MJ, Gonçalo D (2023). Visual Information in Basketball Jump-Shots: Differences between Youth and Adult Athletes. J Hum Kinet, 89, 65-75. PMID 38053958. doi:10.5114/jhk/163447

• Ryu D, Abernethy B, Mann DL, Poolton JM (2015). The contributions of central and peripheral vision to expertise in basketball: How blur helps to provide a clearer picture. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 41(1), 167-85. PMID 25485663. doi:10.1037/a0038306

• Ryu D, Mann DL, Abernethy B, Poolton JM (2016). Gaze-contingent training enhances perceptual skill acquisition. J Vis, 16(2), 2. PMID 26824639. doi:10.1167/16.2.2

• Tuncel O, Sadik R, Yuksel O, Kaplan AB, Cakici AP, Karatas CS, Acar G, Soylu C (2026). Acute neuro-athletic training effects on cognitive-motor and technical performance in youth basketball players. Front Behav Neurosci, 20, 1791909. PMID 42028337. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2026.1791909

• Uchida Y, Mizuguchi N, Honda M, Kanosue K (2014). Prediction of shot success for basketball free throws: visual search strategy. Eur J Sport Sci, 14(5), 426-32. PMID 24319995. doi:10.1080/17461391.2013.866166

• Ueyama Y, Harada M (2024). Basketball free-throw training with augmented reality-based optimal shot trajectory for novice shooters. Sci Rep, 14(1), 891. PMID 38195761. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-51190-9

• van Maarseveen MJJ, Oudejans RRD (2018b). Motor and Gaze Behaviors of Youth Basketball Players Taking Contested and Uncontested Jump Shots. Front Psychol, 9, 706. PMID 29867671. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00706

• van Maarseveen MJJ, Savelsbergh GJP, Oudejans RRD (2018a). In situ examination of decision-making skills and gaze behaviour of basketball players. Hum Mov Sci, 57, 205-216. PMID 29253742. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2017.12.006

• Vera J, Jiménez R, Cárdenas D, Redondo B, García JA (2020b). Visual function, performance, and processing of basketball players vs. sedentary individuals. J Sport Health Sci, 9(6), 587-594. PMID 33308808. doi:10.1016/j.jshs.2017.05.001

• Vera J, Molina R, Cárdenas D, Redondo B, Jiménez R (2020a). Basketball free-throws performance depends on the integrity of binocular vision. Eur J Sport Sci, 20(3), 407-414. PMID 31195892. doi:10.1080/17461391.2019.1632385

• Vickers JN (1996). Control of visual attention during the basketball free throw. Am J Sports Med, 24(6 Suppl), S93-7. PMID 8947439.

• Vickers JN, Vandervies B, Kohut C, Ryley B (2017). Quiet eye training improves accuracy in basketball field goal shooting. Prog Brain Res, 234, 1-12. PMID 29031458. doi:10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.06.011

• Vickers JN, Causer J, Vanhooren D (2019). The Role of Quiet Eye Timing and Location in the Basketball Three-Point Shot: A New Research Paradigm. Front Psychol, 10, 2424. PMID 31736825. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02424

• Vine SJ, Wilson MR (2011). The influence of quiet eye training and pressure on attention and visuo-motor control. Acta Psychol (Amst), 136(3), 340-6. PMID 21276584. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.12.008

• Vine SJ, Moore LJ, Wilson MR (2014). Quiet eye training: the acquisition, refinement and resilient performance of targeting skills. Eur J Sport Sci, 14 Suppl 1, S235-42. PMID 24444212. doi:10.1080/17461391.2012.683815

• Weigelt M, Güldenpenning I, Steggemann-Weinrich Y, Alhaj Ahmad Alaboud M, Kunde W (2017). Control over the processing of the opponent's gaze direction in basketball experts. Psychon Bull Rev, 24(3), 828-834. PMID 27542803. doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1140-4

• Wilson MR, Vine SJ, Wood G (2009). The influence of anxiety on visual attentional control in basketball free throw shooting. J Sport Exerc Psychol, 31(2), 152-68. PMID 19454769. doi:10.1123/jsep.31.2.152

• Wilson MR, Webb A, Wylie LJ, Vine SJ (2018). The quiet eye is sensitive to exercise-induced physiological stress. Prog Brain Res, 240, 35-52. PMID 30390839. doi:10.1016/bs.pbr.2018.08.008

• Wu Y, Zeng Y, Zhang L, Wang S, Wang D, Tan X, Zhu X, Zhang J, Zhang J (2013). The role of visual perception in action anticipation in basketball athletes. Neuroscience, 237, 29-41. PMID 23384606. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.01.048

• Xiao W, Jiang Z (2024). Multiple object tracking training affects the executive function in basketball players: the role of instant feedback. BMC Psychol, 12(1), 417. PMID 39085918. doi:10.1186/s40359-024-01931-2

• Xu N, Wang X, Miao X, Song J, Zhang X, Ren P, Zhang Y, Chi L (2026). From Pattern Recognition to Abstract Representation: Visual Search and Neural Mechanisms of Structured Pattern Processing in Skilled Basketball Players. J Eye Mov Res, 19(5). PMID 42930940. doi:10.3390/jemr19050116

• Yang M, Guo Y, Yang F, Zhao K (2026). Exploring the association between visual skills and sport-specific performance in team athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Physiol, 17, 1797347. PMID 41983007. doi:10.3389/fphys.2026.1797347

• Yu H, Zhu Y, Gai B (2026). Complexity Amplifies Expertise: Visual Search and Anticipatory Skill Adaptations in Skilled Basketball Players. Percept Mot Skills, 133(5), 1548-1566. PMID 41165080. doi:10.1177/00315125251394789

• Zemková E, Hamar D (2010). The effect of 6-week combined agility-balance training on neuromuscular performance in basketball players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 50(3), 262-7. PMID 20842085.

• Zhang W, Li S, Zhao C (2026a). Fixation control and three-point field goal percentage in female collegiate basketball players: an eye-tracking study. Sci Rep, 16(1). PMID 42000840. doi:10.1038/s41598-026-48226-7

• Zhang X, Li S, Zhao C (2026b). Exercise intensity and shooting position modulate fixation behavior and 2-point shooting accuracy in elite female basketball players: An eye-tracking study. PLoS One, 21(4), e0348017. PMID 42060627. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0348017

• Zhao C, Li S, Zhao X (2023). Empirical study on visual attention characteristics of basketball players of different levels during free-throw shooting. PeerJ, 11, e16607. PMID 38099305. doi:10.7717/peerj.16607

• Zhao C, Liu N, Li S (2024a). Study on the relationship between fixation characteristics and hit rate in psychological procedure training of free throw. PLoS One, 19(5), e0293436. PMID 38723019. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0293436

• Zhao C, Liu N, Li S, Zhao X (2024b). Investigation of eye movement characteristics during free throws at varying intensities among basketball players and its correlation with free throw percentage. PLoS One, 19(8), e0299938. PMID 39172908. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0299938

• Zhao X, Zhao C, Liu N, Li S (2024c). Investigating the eye movement characteristics of basketball players executing 3-point shot at varied intensities and their correlation with shot accuracy. PeerJ, 12, e17634. PMID 41918708. doi:10.7717/peerj.17634

• Zwierko T, Puchalska-Niedbał L, Krzepota J, Markiewicz M, Woźniak J, Lubiński W (2015). The Effects of Sports Vision Training on Binocular Vision Function in Female University Athletes. J Hum Kinet, 49, 287-96. PMID 26925183. doi:10.1515/hukin-2015-0131

• Zwierko T, Popowczak M, Woźniak J, Rokita A (2018). Visual control in basketball shooting under exertion conditions. J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 58(10), 1544-1553. PMID 28745471. doi:10.23736/S0022-4707.17.07522-3

• Zwierko T, Lesiakowski P, Redondo B, Vera J (2022). Examining the ability to track multiple moving targets as a function of postural stability: a comparison between team sports players and sedentary individuals. PeerJ, 10, e13964. PMID 36071825. doi:10.7717/peerj.13964