A quick cookie question 🍪
By the way, can we use a tracker to see where you came from and measure our ads? Are you okay with that? Learn more
When the same protocol gives unstable results, the exercise is rarely the cause. Moving from the logic of the exercise to the logic of the reading.
The RNP training space, free for life
Get access to RNP training, no strings attached.
For a long time, I believed the difference came down to the right exercise: the right variation, the right angle, the right progression. I was looking for the perfect sequence, the tool nobody had found yet.
Sometimes it worked. But with the same protocol and the same profile, results stayed unstable: one day it holds, the next day everything collapses. And at each relapse, the same reflex: change the exercise.
Until the day I understood that I was working on the output, the movement, the exercise, without ever questioning what was happening upstream. Movement answers to an estimate made by the nervous system, which constantly evaluates context, threat and the reliability of its sensors.
If the estimate is unstable, the output will be unstable, whatever the quality of the exercise (the motor decision). That day, I stopped looking for the right exercise and started looking for the right variable to manage.
A limited thoracic rotation: immediate gain with a mobility exercise, back to square one at the next session. The problem had less to do with the rotation than with the safety perceived during the rotation.
A seven-year-old who improves at handwriting during the session, then nothing in class. The graphic gesture wasn't the issue: his nervous system didn't have the sensory resources to maintain coordination in the noise of a classroom (the ceiling you see at school).
Neck tension that keeps coming back to the same spot, on the same side. The tissues had been worked on; when testing, the lead that emerged was a body that locks down to stabilize the head, and that is where the work took hold.
Three times the same reflex, changing the exercise; three times, the answer was in the reading.
What changed in my practice is where I look, much more than the number of tools: perception, integration, action. When perception changes, action lines up. Before, I wanted to be the one with the best exercise; today, I want to understand why it's stuck.
The person in front of you feels this shift, and so do the parents. You no longer apply protocols, you read, and that is where results become lasting, reproducible and explainable (the missing reading grid).
The day you stop looking for the right exercise, your results start to hold.
To discover this reading, the introduction to RNP, Neuro-Postural Reprogramming, is free.
You are a practitioner and you want to know whether the training is right for you: book a call with the team.
Two articles to read on the blog: the learning pyramid, and the tickle that vanishes after thirty seconds of pressure.
Read the article NewsletterStrong, flexible, and still stuck. Around the shoulder, small sensors decide the range of motion. What that changes for the physio, the coach, the parent.
Read the article NewsletterWhen the head moves, the inner ear and vision stabilize the body. Why a strong athlete loses footing on the field, and a 30-second test.
Read the articleThe RNP system is meant to be read, targeted and tested from your next assessment. Start with the member space, for free.