A quick cookie question 🍪
By the way, can we use a tracker to see where you came from and measure our ads? Are you okay with that? Learn more
A result that vanishes with speed or fatigue hasn't changed the system. Test-retest under constraint shows what your results are really worth.
The RNP training space, free for life
Get access to RNP training, no strings attached.
Your client tests a hip rotation: ten degrees less on the left than on the right for months. You step in, you stimulate, you retest, and the ten degrees are there. He's surprised; you, not really.
Two weeks later he comes back, puzzled: "It was fine the next day, but by the third workout I felt I was going backward." The usual answer is to intervene again and reproduce the result, without asking the real question: does the result hold, or only when conditions are good?
The value of a result is measured under constraint, far more than at the moment it appears. A gain that disappears as soon as speed goes up or fatigue sets in has changed a momentary state, without changing the system (how long the effect of a stimulation lasts).
Yet many demonstrations take place under controlled conditions, on rested subjects. What is rarely shown is what happens next, when the body goes back to its usual load and the old pattern takes over again.
Most approaches resemble a mechanic who checks that the engine idles, then hands back the keys: it runs, but the client drives on the highway. Functional proof follows three steps:
a change that is visible right away, which the client measures himself
a change that shows up in his real movement
a change that holds with speed, load and fatigue
Motor learning documents this clearly: a pattern acquired within a narrow window of conditions breaks apart as soon as they change, as long as it hasn't been consolidated within variability (we train in calm, we play in chaos).
The hierarchy is simple: a good test is worth more than a nice explanation, good transfer is worth more than a good test, and stability under fatigue is worth more than both combined.
In training, the exercise often produces the same moment. Participants test a result under usual conditions: it holds. They add a light load, a moderate speed: depending on the case, the result holds up or collapses. A strength and conditioning coach with several years in the field went through it, then summed it up: "I thought I had done my job. In fact, I had done half." It was a clarification, and it lastingly changed the way he chooses his levers.
What you prove under easy conditions, anyone can show. What you prove under fatigue is a result.
To understand how to make learning stick, the pathway "How we learn to move" is free, and so is the introduction to RNP, Neuro-Postural Reprogramming.
You're a practitioner and you want to know whether the training is right for you: book a call with the team.
Two articles to read on the blog: the learning pyramid, and the tickle that vanishes after thirty seconds of pressure.
Read the article NewsletterStrong, flexible, and still stuck. Around the shoulder, small sensors decide the range of motion. What that changes for the physio, the coach, the parent.
Read the article NewsletterWhen the head moves, the inner ear and vision stabilize the body. Why a strong athlete loses footing on the field, and a 30-second test.
Read the articleThe RNP system is meant to be read, targeted and tested from your next assessment. Start with the member space, for free.