Goalkeeper gaze: penalty anticipation and perceptual training, what 50 studies say

In brief. In football, handball and hockey, expert goalkeepers anticipate the shot better than novices, and their gaze changes as soon as they have to dive. Perceptual training improves anticipation on video, with up to five months of retention in one trial, but no controlled trial has counted saves in matches. 50 studies analyzed. Updated on November 3, 2026.

Hello to you, the movement professional,

The same experienced football goalkeepers, five ways of responding to the penalty: by voice or joystick in front of a video, then, facing the kicker, by voice, with a simplified movement or by actually diving. As long as the body moves little, their eyes stay longer on the kicker than on the ball. When the shot has to be stopped, gaze time is split equally between the two (Dicks et al., 2010a). Modeled over time by the same team, the gaze of the diving goalkeeper lands first on the kicker's head, then shifts to the ball for roughly the last second before the strike (Button et al., 2011).

The goalkeeper coach sees the problem straight away: a good part of what we know about goalkeeper gaze was measured in front of a screen, and the screen changes the gaze. So what does an expert goalkeeper pick up before the ball leaves, and what is left, at the dive, of what they are taught on video?

Goalkeeper anticipation: reading the kicker before contact

For a goalkeeper, anticipating means committing to the save on what the kicker shows before the ball or the puck leaves. Researchers cut the video of the shot before, during or just after contact (temporal occlusion), record where the eyes land and measure the quiet eye, the last stable fixation before the action, detailed in our article on the quiet eye in precision movements.

Twelve goalkeepers and twelve outfield players, who had to intercept filmed penalties, do not exploit the cues visible before impact when they leave before the strike; the goalkeepers start faster and, according to the authors, then bet on the probabilities of the situation (Peiyong and Inomata, 2012). The motor reaction time therefore weighs on strategy. On penalties taken by professional and semi-professional players, the goalkeeper commits to the side of the save before contact, and to the height about 245 ms afterward, on the trajectory of the ball (Higueras-Herbada et al., 2020). The side is read on the kicker, the height on the ball.

What expert goalkeepers look at when facing a penalty

On filmed penalties, expert goalkeepers predict better, wait longer and use fewer, longer fixations: novices linger on the trunk, arms and hips, experts on the kicking leg, the standing leg and the ball (Savelsbergh et al., 2002). Among experts, the most accurate seem to fixate the standing leg longer (Savelsbergh et al., 2005). With the standing leg doctored on 20 of 40 videos, 17 goalkeepers nevertheless predict just as well: according to the authors, the gaze anchors on the kicking leg and the ball, and peripheral vision completes the reading (Woolley et al., 2015). Judgments track information spread across several body segments (Diaz et al., 2012), and patterned shirts that mask the alignment of the hips only hinder skilled goalkeepers (Causer and Williams, 2015).

This reading remains specific to the sport: among 216 athletes, skilled footballers guess the penalty better than all the others, less skilled footballers included (Andrew and Causer, 2022). In open play, elite goalkeepers also spot the future shooter earlier (Murphy et al., 2025), an information pickup close to scanning in football.

In front of the screen or facing the kicker, the goalkeeper's gaze changes

In handball goalkeepers of three levels, responding with a key press gives better scores than responding with a real movement, but the gaps between levels appear, descriptively, more marked when the body is engaged (Huesmann et al., 2022). A test decoupled from action erases part of the expertise. This is perception-action coupling: we perceive according to what our body allows us to do.

Action capabilities also enter the calculation. Among experienced goalkeepers, the fastest leave later than the slowest (Dicks et al., 2010b). Facing real penalties with feints, run-up information hinders the save, and the authors advise preferring what appears just before the strike (Dicks et al., 2010c). In futsal, at 10 m rather than 6 m, expert goalkeepers save more, leave later and look more at the ball (Navia et al., 2017). In virtual reality, facing curved free kicks, the goalkeeper's hands follow the initial direction of the ball and poorly compensate for the curve (Dessing and Craig, 2010).

The goalkeeper's quiet eye: clear in hockey, debated in football

In ice hockey and handball, the quiet eye lasts longer on saves, and in hockey it also starts earlier, landing on the puck or the stick rather than on the shooter. In football, the picture gets blurred. Piras and Vickers (2011) find a longer quiet eye on saves, but a final fixation that is too long on the ball announces the goal there, whereas Savelsbergh et al. (2002) see no gaze difference between saves and goals. Microsaccades, those small eye movements during fixation, even announce the side of the dive, while ocular saccades peak around 500 ms before the start (Piras et al., 2021). Ramsey et al. (2020), on five goalkeepers, and Franks et al. (2022), in a case study, describe a duration that changes from one goalkeeper and one save to another: they contradict the idea of a common target duration, without proving that it does not exist.

Looking at the same place does not guarantee picking up as much, by the way: handball goalkeepers predict left-handers' 7-m throws less well without looking at them differently (Loffing et al., 2015).

Handball goalkeeper and hockey goalkeeper: 7-m throws, puck and drag-flick

As early as 1979, 34 young ice hockey goaltenders (15.8 years on average) read the shot better when the film showed more frames before impact, better the wrist shot than the slap shot, and better the horizontal plane than the vertical (Salmela and Fiorito, 1979): side before height, as in football. In field hockey, five of eight international or national goalkeepers keep their reading of wide run-ups when going from women to men shooters at the drag-flick, none for tight run-ups (Morris-Binelli et al., 2022). The handball outfield player has their own article, vision and handball. For the water polo goalkeeper, no study on gaze appears in PubMed at the date of this inventory.

Training goalkeeper anticipation: video, cues and kicker preferences

Two scoping reviews from the same group (20 studies on expertise, 13 on training) describe research centered on adult men, in standardized laboratory penalties, little coupled to action, and conclude conditionally: explicit, guided-discovery or implicit approaches could improve anticipation (Huesmann et al., 2025).

The trials mostly compare ways of learning. In 60 novices, the gains hold for five months (Abernethy et al., 2012), a rare duration: the other quantified retention in the table is 24 hours (Ryu et al., 2013), far from a true retention test several weeks later. When a placebo group that watches matches improves as much as the explicit group (Poulter et al., 2005), familiarization with the test weighs heavily. Knowing the kicker's preference helps (Murta et al., 2022; Ji et al., 2023), as long as they remain faithful to it (Mann et al., 2014). The feint remains the hard point: video training gains less there (Alsharji and Wade, 2016), and videos filtered in spatial frequencies remove the drop in anticipation on deceptive shots in goalkeepers tested online, with no training trial to date (Roberts et al., 2026).

The duel seen from the shooter's side: what the goalkeeper provokes

The goalkeeper also acts on the shooter's gaze. Under threat, the shooter fixates them more and recenters the shot; a goalkeeper who waves their arms, or stands imperceptibly off-center on the line, weighs on the choice of side. The shooter poorly exploits a goalkeeper who leaves early, unless the cue is explained to them.

From video to the save in a match: the link nobody has measured

Near transfer is established: trained on video, the goalkeeper improves on a video of the same type. On real penalties, only two studies: 18 novices trained on the field facing three players, two of whom stop before the strike, save more shots without feints than those trained facing a single kicker (Dicks et al., 2017), and a goalkeeper under ten delays their start when given the shooters' tendencies (Luis-Del Campo et al., 2024). Far transfer, saves in matches, has been measured by no controlled trial in this inventory. Null results weigh just as much: color cues with no effect (Abernethy et al., 2012), unguided group with no progress (Ryu et al., 2013), reaction time unchanged (Faquin et al., 2024), placebo as good as explicit training (Poulter et al., 2005), trained shooter who loses their advantage under pressure (Wood and Wilson, 2011). Because expertise sticks to the sport and the opponent, representative design keeps, in training, the link between what you see and what you do, the same conclusion as for the athlete's neurocognitive training.

Links between the studies

This body of work rests in large part on a few teams. Around Dicks, Button and Davids, the studies take place in real situations and insist on variability. Around Schorer, Loffing and Hagemann, you find a good share of the work on the handball goalkeeper and the 2025 review. At Exeter, Wilson, Wood and Vine studied the shooter under threat.

The limits of the goalkeeper file, and the missing trial

Established: the expert goalkeeper anticipates better than the novice, reads the side before the height, and their gaze changes depending on whether they respond to a screen or dive. Debated: the weight of the quiet eye, clear in hockey and handball, variable in football, and the role of the standing leg. Extrapolated: that a goalkeeper who improves on a video test saves more penalties on Sunday. No quiet eye duration serves as an individual norm either.

One prediction would settle it. A randomized trial in club goalkeepers compares video anticipation training with an equal volume of real penalties, with saves on real shots, feinted or not, as the criterion, and retention over several weeks. If it finds no difference, the idea that the screen trains the save falls.

Double vision, blur, dizziness: who to consult for a goalkeeper

If your athlete reports double vision, blur that persists, headaches on exertion or dizziness, visual training waits. They first consult an ophthalmologist, then an orthoptist in France, or an optometrist in Switzerland or the United States. LabO RNP is neither medical nor paramedical, and is an addition to a care pathway, never a replacement for it. LabO RNP works with optometrists; the curriculum was built with them.

Why the dive is part of the goalkeeper's perception

The eyes are a point of entry. What LabO RNP teaches is the whole sensorimotor loop: how what the athlete perceives organizes what they do. In the goalkeeper, the gaze does not pick up the same thing when the body stays still or goes into a dive, and their speed of movement sets the moment when they can afford to wait. For the place of the eyes in the warm-up, read our article on oculomotor exercises in the warm-up; for the whole range of visual training families, the map of evidence in sports vision.

Goalkeeper anticipation: five coaches' questions

What does a goalkeeper look at on a penalty?

On video, expert football goalkeepers mainly fixate the kicking leg, the standing leg and the ball, with fewer fixations than novices (Savelsbergh et al., 2002). Facing a real kicker, they look first at his head, then at the ball for roughly the last second before the strike (Button et al., 2011).

Can you train a goalkeeper's anticipation?

On video, yes: guided cues, explicit rules and implicit learning improve prediction, with five months of retention in 60 novices (Abernethy et al., 2012). On real penalties, a field trial in 18 novices (Dicks et al., 2017) and the case of a goalkeeper under ten (Luis-Del Campo et al., 2024) point in the same direction. No controlled trial has measured saves in matches.

Does the quiet eye predict a goalkeeper's saves?

In ice hockey and handball, an earlier or longer quiet eye goes with saves (Panchuk and Vickers, 2006; Jedziniak et al., 2025). In football, results diverge, and quiet eye duration varies from one goalkeeper and one save to another (Ramsey et al., 2020).

Do handball and hockey goalkeepers read the shot as in football?

In part. In ice hockey as in football, the side of the shot is read better than its height (Salmela and Fiorito, 1979). Expertise nevertheless sticks to the opponent: field hockey goalkeepers poorly transfer their reading from women to men shooters (Morris-Binelli et al., 2022), and handball goalkeepers read left-handers less well (Loffing et al., 2015).

Is a visual assessment needed before working on a goalkeeper's gaze?

Yes, as soon as a signal appears: double vision, blur that persists, headaches on exertion or dizziness. The ophthalmologist comes first, then the orthoptist in France or the optometrist in Switzerland and the United States. LabO RNP is neither medical nor paramedical, and is an addition to a care pathway, never a replacement for it.

The goalkeeper reads the kicker with their whole body, and it is in the dive that you check what the screen has taught them.

👉 I want to understand what my goalkeeper perceives before correcting their dive.

By the LabO RNP team

Method. Inventory of November 3, 2026, drawn from the LabO RNP inventory of studies on athlete vision and a complementary PubMed search: 64 studies on the goalkeeper or the penalty identified, 50 analyzed. Excluded: references without an abstract or readable text, studies on the shooter alone, classification of goalkeepers by machine learning, tasks outside shot anticipation. No PubMed study on the water polo goalkeeper's gaze. PMIDs verified on PubMed on November 3, 2026; four non-indexed studies cited by their DOI, verified on Crossref.

Sources

• Abernethy B, Schorer J, Jackson RC, Hagemann N (2012). Perceptual training methods compared: the relative efficacy of different approaches to enhancing sport-specific anticipation. J Exp Psychol Appl, 18(2), 143-53. PMID 22564086. doi:10.1037/a0028452

• Alsharji KE, Wade MG (2016). Perceptual training effects on anticipation of direct and deceptive 7-m throws in handball. J Sports Sci, 34(2), 155-62. PMID 25917061. doi:10.1080/02640414.2015.1039463

• Amini Farsani M, Shahbazi M, Tahmasebi Boroujeni S (2023). Improvement in soccer goalkeepers' spatial anticipation during penalty kicks as a result of PETTLEP imagery intervention. Journal of Imagery Research in Sport and Physical Activity, 18(1). Not indexed in PubMed. doi:10.1515/jirspa-2023-0022

• Andrew M, Causer J (2022). Does anticipation of penalty kicks in soccer transfer across similar and dissimilar sports?. Cogn Process, 23(3), 459-465. PMID 35355142. doi:10.1007/s10339-021-01073-y

• Button C, Dicks M, Haines R, Barker R, Davids K (2011). Statistical modelling of gaze behaviour as categorical time series: what you should watch to save soccer penalties. Cogn Process, 12(3), 235-44. PMID 21140189. doi:10.1007/s10339-010-0384-6

• Causer J, Williams AM (2015). The use of patterns to disguise environmental cues during an anticipatory judgment task. J Sport Exerc Psychol, 37(1), 74-82. PMID 25730893. doi:10.1123/jsep.2014-0200

• Dessing JC, Craig CM (2010). Bending it like Beckham: how to visually fool the goalkeeper. PLoS One, 5(10), e13161. PMID 20949130. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013161

• Diaz GJ, Fajen BR, Phillips F (2012). Anticipation from biological motion: the goalkeeper problem. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 38(4), 848-64. PMID 22309088. doi:10.1037/a0026962

• Dicks M, Button C, Davids K (2010a). Examination of gaze behaviors under in situ and video simulation task constraints reveals differences in information pickup for perception and action. Atten Percept Psychophys, 72(3), 706-20. PMID 20348577. doi:10.3758/APP.72.3.706

• Dicks M, Davids K, Button C (2010b). Individual differences in the visual control of intercepting a penalty kick in association football. Hum Mov Sci, 29(3), 401-11. PMID 20359763. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2010.02.008

• Dicks M, Button C, Davids K (2010c). Availability of advance visual information constrains association-football goalkeeping performance during penalty kicks. Perception, 39(8), 1111-24. PMID 20942362. doi:10.1068/p6442

• Dicks M, Pocock C, Thelwell R, van der Kamp J (2017). A Novel On-Field Training Intervention Improves Novice Goalkeeper Penalty Kick Performance. The Sport Psychologist, 31(2), 129-133. Not indexed in PubMed. doi:10.1123/tsp.2015-0148

• Faquin BS, Teixeira LA, Candido CRC, Arias RLB, Okazaki VHA (2024). Perceptual training with implicit and explicit learning improves the prediction of ball direction in soccer penalty kicks. Int J Psychol, 59(6), 1158-1167. PMID 39295164. doi:10.1002/ijop.13245

• Franks B, Roberts WM, Jakeman J, Swain J, Davids K (2022). A Descriptive Case Study of Skilled Football Goalkeepers During 1 v 1 Dyads: A Case for Adaptive Variability in the Quiet Eye. Front Psychol, 13, 908123. PMID 35874354. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.908123

• Higueras-Herbada A, Lopes JE, Travieso D, Ibáñez-Gijón J, Araújo D, Jacobs DM (2020). Height After Side: Goalkeepers Detect the Vertical Direction of Association-Football Penalty Kicks From the Ball Trajectory. Front Psychol, 11, 311. PMID 32174871. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00311

• Huesmann K, Loffing F, Büsch D, Schorer J, Hagemann N (2022). Varying Degrees of Perception-Action Coupling and Anticipation in Handball Goalkeeping. J Mot Behav, 54(4), 391-400. PMID 34663190. doi:10.1080/00222895.2021.1984868

• Huesmann K, Schorer J, Büsch D, Loffing F (2025). Expertise and training of anticipation in goalkeeping: Two scoping reviews. J Sports Sci, 43(18), 2075-2099. PMID 40684285. doi:10.1080/02640414.2025.2533002

• Jedziniak W, Panek K, Lesiakowski P, Florkiewicz B, Zwierko T (2025). Differences in Gaze Behavior Between Male and Female Elite Handball Goalkeepers During Penalty Throws. Brain Sci, 15(3). PMID 40149833. doi:10.3390/brainsci15030312

• Ji Q, Zhou C, Wang Y (2023). Influence of conflicting prior information on action anticipation in soccer players: an ERP study. Front Behav Neurosci, 17, 1320900. PMID 38131060. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1320900

• Loffing F, Sölter F, Hagemann N, Strauss B (2015). Accuracy of Outcome Anticipation, But Not Gaze Behavior, Differs Against Left- and Right-Handed Penalties in Team-Handball Goalkeeping. Front Psychol, 6, 1820. PMID 26648887. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01820

• Luis-Del Campo V, Esteves PT, Monteiro LP, Casanova FLM (2024). Case Report: Effect of providing penalty kicking tendencies on goalkeeper's motor behaviour and performance: a case study with an on-field intervention on youth football. Front Sports Act Living, 6, 1356340. PMID 39329051. doi:10.3389/fspor.2024.1356340

• Mann DL, Schaefers T, Cañal-Bruland R (2014). Action preferences and the anticipation of action outcomes. Acta Psychol (Amst), 152, 1-9. PMID 25089880. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.07.004

• Masters RS, van der Kamp J, Jackson RC (2007). Imperceptibly off-center goalkeepers influence penalty-kick direction in soccer. Psychol Sci, 18(3), 222-3. PMID 17444916. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01878.x

• Morris-Binelli K, Müller S, van Rens FECA, Harbaugh AG, Rosalie SM (2022). Individual Differences and Transfer of Visual Anticipation in Expert Female Field Hockey Goalkeepers. Optom Vis Sci, 99(2), 150-158. PMID 34897232. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001851

• Murphy CP, Patel K, Hope E, North JS (2025). Early identification of the opposition shot taker characterises elite goalkeepers' ability to read the game. Sci Med Footb, 9(2), 181-188. PMID 38530231. doi:10.1080/24733938.2024.2329466

• Murta CCF, Albuquerque MR, Greco PJ, Raab M, Praça GM (2022). Goalkeepers put their money where the coach's mouth is: Knowing kickers' preferences enhances anticipation of football goalkeepers. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 20(5), 1507-1522. Not indexed in PubMed. doi:10.1080/1612197x.2021.1987962

• Navia JA, Dicks M, van der Kamp J, Ruiz LM (2017). Gaze control during interceptive actions with different spatiotemporal demands. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 43(4), 783-793. PMID 28345945. doi:10.1037/xhp0000347

• Núñez FJ, Oño A, Raya A, Bilbao A (2010). Effects of providing advance cues during a soccer penalty kick on the kicker's rate of success. Percept Mot Skills, 111(3), 749-60. PMID 21319614. doi:10.2466/05.24.25.PMS.111.6.749-760

• Panchuk D, Vickers JN (2006). Gaze behaviors of goaltenders under spatial-temporal constraints. Hum Mov Sci, 25(6), 733-52. PMID 17050024. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2006.07.001

• Panchuk D, Vickers JN, Hopkins WG (2017). Quiet eye predicts goaltender success in deflected ice hockey shots. Eur J Sport Sci, 17(1), 93-99. PMID 26949176. doi:10.1080/17461391.2016.1156160

• Peiyong Z, Inomata K (2012). Cognitive strategies for goalkeeper responding to soccer penalty kick. Percept Mot Skills, 115(3), 969-83. PMID 23409608. doi:10.2466/30.22.23.PMS.115.6.969-983

• Piras A, Vickers JN (2011). The effect of fixation transitions on quiet eye duration and performance in the soccer penalty kick: instep versus inside kicks. Cogn Process, 12(3), 245-55. PMID 21544570. doi:10.1007/s10339-011-0406-z

• Piras A, Timmis M, Trofè A, Raffi M (2021). Understanding the underlying mechanisms of Quiet Eye: The role of microsaccades, small saccades and pupil-size before final movement initiation in a soccer penalty kick. Eur J Sport Sci, 21(5), 685-694. PMID 32580639. doi:10.1080/17461391.2020.1788648

• Poulter DR, Jackson RC, Wann JP, Berry DC (2005). The effect of learning condition on perceptual anticipation, awareness, and visual search. Hum Mov Sci, 24(3), 345-61. PMID 16084616. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2005.06.005

• Ramsey H, Button C, Davids K, Hacques G, Seifert L, Dicks M (2020). Considerations for the study of individual differences in gaze control during expert visual anticipation: an exploratory study. Movement & Sport Sciences, Science & Motricité, (110), 39-47. Not indexed in PubMed. doi:10.1051/sm/2020006

• Roberts JW, Harris K, Upshaw T, Gillen L, Causer J, Bennett SJ (2026). The influence of low and high spatial frequency visual information on the anticipation of soccer penalty kicks. Psychol Sport Exerc, 84, 103092. PMID 41713824. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2026.103092

• Ryu D, Kim S, Abernethy B, Mann DL (2013). Guiding attention aids the acquisition of anticipatory skill in novice soccer goalkeepers. Res Q Exerc Sport, 84(2), 252-62. PMID 23930552. doi:10.1080/02701367.2013.784843

• Salmela JH, Fiorito P (1979). Visual cues in ice hockey goaltending. Can J Appl Sport Sci, 4(1), 56-9. PMID 498402. No DOI assigned

• Savelsbergh GJ, Williams AM, Van der Kamp J, Ward P (2002). Visual search, anticipation and expertise in soccer goalkeepers. J Sports Sci, 20(3), 279-87. PMID 11999482. doi:10.1080/026404102317284826

• Savelsbergh GJ, Van der Kamp J, Williams AM, Ward P (2005). Anticipation and visual search behaviour in expert soccer goalkeepers. Ergonomics, 48(11-14), 1686-97. PMID 16338733. doi:10.1080/00140130500101346

• Shafizadeh M, Plat GK (2012). Effect of verbal cueing on trajectory anticipation in the penalty kick among novice football goalkeepers. Percept Mot Skills, 114(1), 174-84. PMID 22582686. doi:10.2466/05.23.25.PMS.114.1.174-184

• Shafizadeh M, Davids K, Correia V, Wheat J, Hizan H (2016). Informational constraints on interceptive actions of elite football goalkeepers in 1v1 dyads during competitive performance. J Sports Sci, 34(17), 1596-601. PMID 26652039. doi:10.1080/02640414.2015.1125011

• Timmis MA, Piras A, van Paridon KN (2018). Keep Your Eye on the Ball; the Impact of an Anticipatory Fixation During Successful and Unsuccessful Soccer Penalty Kicks. Front Psychol, 9, 2058. PMID 30429808. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02058

• van der Kamp J (2011). Exploring the merits of perceptual anticipation in the soccer penalty kick. Motor Control, 15(3), 342-58. PMID 21878688. doi:10.1123/mcj.15.3.342

• Weigelt M, Memmert D (2012). Goal-side selection in soccer penalty kicking when viewing natural scenes. Front Psychol, 3, 312. PMID 22973246. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00312

• Wilson MR, Wood G, Vine SJ (2009). Anxiety, attentional control, and performance impairment in penalty kicks. J Sport Exerc Psychol, 31(6), 761-75. PMID 20384011. doi:10.1123/jsep.31.6.761

• Wood G, Wilson MR (2010). A moving goalkeeper distracts penalty takers and impairs shooting accuracy. J Sports Sci, 28(9), 937-46. PMID 20568032. doi:10.1080/02640414.2010.495995

• Wood G, Wilson MR (2011). Quiet-eye training for soccer penalty kicks. Cogn Process, 12(3), 257-66. PMID 21318734. doi:10.1007/s10339-011-0393-0

• Wood G, Vine SJ, Parr J, Wilson MR (2017). Aiming to Deceive: Examining the Role of the Quiet Eye During Deceptive Aiming Actions. J Sport Exerc Psychol, 39(5), 327-338. PMID 29185367. doi:10.1123/jsep.2017-0016

• Woolley TL, Crowther RG, Doma K, Connor JD (2015). The use of spatial manipulation to examine goalkeepers' anticipation. J Sports Sci, 33(17), 1766-74. PMID 25695331. doi:10.1080/02640414.2015.1014830