Discover how neurology influences our movement: the same body, varied performances depending on stress and context. Dive into this fascinating reality!
The RNP training space, free for life
Get access to RNP training, no strings attached.
Movement is often approached as a mechanical problem. We talk about strengthening muscles, mobilizing joints, correcting gestures. However, everyone experiences the opposite daily. Sometimes the body is strong, mobile, trained, yet clumsy, rigid, or imprecise. This discrepancy raises a simple question: if everything were mechanical, why would performance vary so much without apparent structural change?
In everyday life, this reality is easily observable. A person may feel perfectly coordinated in a familiar environment, then become clumsy under stress, fatigue, or emotional pressure. The muscles are the same, the joints too. What has changed is the state of the nervous system and how it processes information. The movement has changed because the functional neurology of the system has adapted to a new context.
For movement professionals, this phenomenon is daily. An athlete can execute a gesture precisely in training, then lose it in a competition situation. The technique has not disappeared. It has become inaccessible. The nervous system, subjected to different constraints, has changed its priorities. The movement is no longer organized in the same way.
Functional neurology applied to movement is precisely interested in these variations. It does not seek to identify lesions or pathologies but to understand how the nervous system functions in a given context. It observes the system's outputs, such as posture, coordination, tone, and stability, to deduce the quality of internal organization.
This approach is based on a central idea: movement is an expression. It expresses how the nervous system perceives its environment, anticipates constraints, and chooses its responses. When a movement becomes rigid, imprecise, or costly, it is not necessarily because the body is deficient, but because the system is adapting to what it perceives as a threat, uncertainty, or overload.
In daily life, this perspective profoundly changes the relationship with the body. Instead of trying to correct gestures or force postures, one begins to question what disrupts perception, attention, or adaptability. Movement ceases to be a problem to solve. It becomes an indicator to interpret.
For movement professionals, this perspective is crucial. It allows moving beyond a fragmented view of the body, where each deficit calls for a local correction. It invites considering the nervous system as the main organizer of movement, and mechanics as a consequence of this organization.
Research in motor control and neuromechanics, notably by Roger Enoka or Nikolai Bernstein, has widely shown that human movement cannot be understood without integrating the neurological dimension. Research on postural control and sensory integration, such as that by Thierry Paillard, reinforces this idea by showing that motor adaptation closely depends on the quality of information perceived and integrated by the nervous system.
It is precisely in this continuity that Neuro-Postural Reprogramming fits. It does not present itself as a method of functional neurology, but as a framework applied to real movement. A framework that allows understanding why a body organizes itself in such a way, and how it can regain fluidity without being constrained.
This article aims to lay the foundations of this reading. Not to transform movement into a medical object, but to reveal its functional neurological dimension. A dimension accessible to all, but essential for professionals who wish to understand movement beyond its visible form.
The term functional neurology is often misunderstood. It sometimes evokes a medical specialty, sometimes a mysterious approach reserved for experts. This confusion is largely due to a framing error. Functional neurology, as applied to movement, does not seek to diagnose lesions or treat pathologies. It seeks to understand how the nervous system functions when it acts.
In daily life, this distinction is essential. A person may feel clumsy, slow, or rigid without any neurological damage being present. Examinations are normal, structures intact. Yet, movement is costly. This discrepancy does not stem from a structural problem, but from functioning. The nervous system is intact, but its organization is momentarily or durably less efficient.
For movement professionals, this situation is common. An athlete may lose coordination without injury, without muscle deficit, without joint limitation. The mechanics are available, but access to this mechanics is disrupted. Functional neurology precisely allows reading this type of situation without falling into a pathological interpretation.
Talking about functional neurology, therefore, means talking about function before talking about structure. The nervous system is seen as an adaptive system, capable of modifying its responses based on context, experience, and perceived constraints. As long as the structures are intact, variations in performance, posture, or coordination are primarily due to this adaptation.
In daily life, this logic explains why movement changes with the internal state. Fatigue, stress, attention, or environment are enough to modify the quality of the gesture. The body has not changed. The nervous system, however, has adjusted its priorities. Functional neurology observes these adjustments and seeks to understand their logic.
For movement professionals, this approach allows moving away from a binary view of human functioning. There is not on one side the normal and on the other the pathological. There is a multitude of intermediate functional states, in which the nervous system does its best with the available information and resources. The quality of movement then becomes an indicator of this state, not a verdict.
This reading aligns with the modern foundations of motor control. Nikolai Bernstein's work has shown that movement is not programmed in detail, but organized according to constraints. The nervous system does not seek mechanical perfection. It seeks a viable, economical, and sufficiently stable solution to allow action. Functional neurology fits into this continuity: it observes the solutions chosen by the system.
In daily practice, this allows understanding why some “corrections” fail. Correcting a movement without considering the functional logic of the system amounts to imposing a solution that the system has not chosen. As long as this solution is not perceived as more effective or safer, it will not be retained.
For professionals, this understanding requires a change of posture. It is no longer about looking for what is wrong, but understanding what works, even imperfectly. A rigid motor strategy, for example, is not an error. It is a response. A response from a system that seeks to limit uncertainty.
Functional neurology applied to movement does not seek to “correct the brain.” It seeks to read how the brain and associated structures organize movement here and now. It observes posture, tone, coordination, and stability as functional outputs of the nervous system.
Within the framework of Neuro-Postural Reprogramming, this reading is central. It allows approaching movement without medicalizing it, while respecting the neurological complexity of humans. The nervous system is not reduced to an abstract organ. It is observed through what it produces: movement.
Understanding what functional neurology really is, therefore, means accepting to shift the perspective. Moving from searching for faults to reading strategies. Moving from mechanical correction to neurological interpretation. This change of perspective naturally prepares the ground for the next question: how does the nervous system concretely organize movement?
This is precisely what we will explore in the next chapter.
When we stop considering movement as merely a matter of muscles and joints, a clear fact emerges: what organizes movement is not the available strength, but the way the nervous system coordinates this strength. Muscles never act alone. They respond to signals, fit into sequences, and activate according to precise timing. This timing, coordination, and prioritization are the domain of the nervous system.
In everyday life, this organization is visible in ordinary situations. A person may feel surprisingly clumsy one day, then perfectly coordinated the next, without any change in their strength or mobility. What has changed is the state of the nervous system. Its ability to organize movement, anticipate constraints, and adjust tone has altered. Movement reflects this state much more than it reflects mechanical capability.
For movement professionals, this reality is observable as soon as constraints increase. An athlete may possess significant strength and mastered technique but lose coordination under fatigue or pressure. The problem is not muscular. It is organizational. The nervous system, faced with informational overload, simplifies movement, reduces degrees of freedom, and favors safer but less effective strategies.
The work of Roger Enoka in neuromechanics has greatly contributed to this understanding. They show that force production, coordination, and fatigue cannot be dissociated from the functioning of the nervous system. Strength is never a raw datum. It is constantly modulated by central and peripheral mechanisms that adjust recruitment, timing, and intensity of muscle activation.
This organization largely relies on subcortical structures. The brainstem plays a central role in regulating postural tone and reflex responses. It acts as a background regulator, keeping the body within a functioning zone compatible with action. The cerebellum, on the other hand, adjusts the precision, timing, and fine coordination of movement. It constantly compares what was expected with what is produced and corrects discrepancies.
In daily life, this regulation is generally invisible. A person stands up, walks, grabs an object without thinking about it. The nervous system orchestrates these actions with remarkable efficiency. But as soon as the environment becomes unpredictable or fatigue sets in, these regulations become more apparent. Movement loses fluidity, the body stiffens, coordination degrades. The nervous system adjusts its organization to preserve stability.
For movement professionals, understanding the role of these structures allows many situations to be reinterpreted. A rigid posture is not necessarily a sign of a lack of mobility. It may indicate an increase in background tone orchestrated by the brainstem to secure action. A loss of precision may reflect a difficulty of the cerebellum to adjust movement in a given context, without any lesion being present.
This interpretation aligns with the principles set by Nikolai Bernstein. Faced with the complexity of human movement, the nervous system does not seek to control every detail. It organizes synergies, liberates or constrains degrees of freedom based on perceived constraints. When the environment is stable and predictable, movement can be fine and economical. When uncertainty increases, the system reduces variability to gain security.
In everyday life, this logic explains why some people adopt very controlled movements in environments they deem uncertain. The body becomes more rigid, less fluid, but more predictable. This strategy is not a mistake. It is an adaptation. It becomes problematic when it persists in contexts where it is no longer necessary.
For movement professionals, this distinction is crucial. Trying to correct rigidity without understanding why the nervous system implemented it is akin to opposing an adaptive strategy. Functional neurology, on the contrary, invites understanding the conditions under which the system agrees to release control and reintroduce variability.
In the context of Neuro-Postural Reprogramming, the nervous system is considered the central organizer of movement. Posture, coordination, and stability are not worked on as isolated qualities but as expressions of this organization. Effective intervention therefore involves addressing the system that orchestrates movement, not just the structures that execute it.
Understanding the nervous system as the organizer of movement allows us to make sense of performance variations, coordination losses, and adaptations observed in the field. This naturally leads to the next question: how does this system rely on perception to organize action?
It is precisely this relationship between perception and movement that we will explore in the next chapter.
Movement is never triggered in a vacuum. Before a muscle contracts, before a posture changes, the nervous system has already processed a considerable amount of information. It has perceived, compared, anticipated. Movement is always a response to perception, even when this perception is not conscious. It is this intimate relationship between perception and action that constitutes the core of functional neurology of movement.
In everyday life, this relationship is easy to observe. A person walks without thinking until the ground becomes slippery. Immediately, posture changes, stride shortens, gaze fixes. The movement was not voluntarily corrected. It adapted because the perception of the environment changed. The nervous system reorganized the action to preserve stability.
For movement professionals, this dynamic is omnipresent. An athlete never executes a gesture in a strictly identical manner. Even in repeated situations, micro-variations appear. These variations are not errors. They are a sign that the nervous system is constantly adjusting movement based on the information it perceives. Functional neurology is precisely interested in this adjustment capability.
Research in motor control has largely shown that perception and action cannot be dissociated. The nervous system does not perceive to then act. It perceives while acting, and acts while perceiving. This perception-action loop operates continuously. When one of its components degrades, the other is immediately affected.
In everyday life, this interdependence explains why cognitive or emotional fatigue alters movement. A stressed person may stumble more easily, lose precision, or feel less stable. The muscles are functional, but perception is disturbed. The nervous system processes information less finely, and movement suffers.
For movement professionals, this observation is fundamental. It helps understand why some motor difficulties are not resolved by strengthening or mechanical repetition. If perception remains blurred or inconsistent, action cannot stabilize sustainably. The nervous system continues to adapt to information it deems unreliable.
The notion of adaptation is central to this loop. The nervous system does not aim to produce a perfect movement, but a movement sufficiently effective to meet the constraints of the moment. This effectiveness is always relative. It depends on the context, the state of the system, and the quality of available information.
In everyday life, this adaptation manifests through simple strategies. A tired person slows down their movements, limits amplitudes, increases background tone. Movement becomes more costly, but more secure. This strategy is temporarily effective. It becomes problematic when it settles in permanently.
For movement professionals, this logic allows many situations to be reinterpreted. A loss of fluidity, a decrease in variability, or persistent rigidity are not isolated defects. They are adaptive responses to a perception deemed uncertain. Functional neurology does not seek to eliminate these responses but to understand why they are necessary.
The work of Thierry Paillard on postural control reinforces this interpretation. They show that stability and motor adaptation directly depend on the nervous system's ability to integrate sensory information. When this integration is effective, the body can remain stable while being mobile. When integration degrades, the system favors more rigid strategies.
In the context of Neuro-Postural Reprogramming, the perception-action loop is considered a dynamic system. Posture, movement, and stability are outputs of this loop. Modifying them sustainably therefore involves acting on the quality of perception and the system's ability to integrate information, rather than focusing solely on the form of the gesture.
Understanding this loop also allows us to reposition motor error in its rightful place. An error is not a failure. It is information. It informs about how the system interprets the task and adjusts its responses. Functional neurology applied to movement relies on this information to refine the understanding of overall functioning.
This interpretation naturally prepares the continuation of the article. If perception and action are inseparable, then posture, stability, and coordination must be reinterpreted as neurological indicators, not merely mechanical parameters. This is precisely what we will address in the next chapter.
Posture is often approached as a form to be corrected. We talk about alignment, imbalance, postural defects. However, if we adopt a functional neurological perspective, this approach quickly shows its limits. Posture is not an ideal position to achieve. It is a strategy. A strategy produced by the nervous system to respond to a set of internal and external constraints.
In everyday life, this reality is evident as soon as the context changes. A person may adopt a different posture depending on whether they are relaxed, stressed, tired, or focused. The body does not "malfunction." It adapts. Posture reflects the state of the nervous system and how it perceives its environment.
For movement professionals, this observation is essential. Two individuals may present a similar posture in appearance, but for radically different reasons. For one, it may indicate an efficient and economical organization. For the other, a protective strategy in response to a perceived instability. Without a neurological perspective, these two situations risk being treated the same way, with very variable results.
The work of Thierry Paillard on postural control has greatly contributed to moving away from a static view of posture. They show that posture is not a fixed state, but a dynamic process, continuously adjusted by the nervous system based on available sensory information. Postural stability is not the absence of movement, but the ability to manage oscillations and disturbances.
In everyday life, this dynamic is noticeable when a person stands without thinking about it. The body constantly oscillates, almost imperceptibly. These micro-adjustments are the sign of an active nervous system, integrating visual, vestibular, and somesthetic information to maintain balance. A completely immobile posture would, paradoxically, be a sign of dysfunction.
For movement professionals, this understanding radically changes the way posture is observed. A rigid posture, with little variability, may seem stable in appearance. In reality, it often indicates a decrease in adaptability. The nervous system has reduced degrees of freedom to secure the situation. Posture then becomes a protection, not an optimization.
Functional neurology precisely allows for this distinction. It does not seek to label a posture as "good" or "bad," but to understand why the nervous system has chosen this organization. An asymmetry, persistent rotation, or trunk inclination can be coherent responses to a specific perception, particularly at the vestibular or visual level.
In everyday life, this logic explains why certain postures persist despite repeated correction attempts. The body systematically returns to its initial strategy, not out of stubbornness, but because this strategy remains the safest for the nervous system. Correcting the form without modifying the perceptual conditions is like fighting against a functional organization.
For movement professionals, this perspective helps avoid a common mistake: trying to normalize posture without understanding the role it plays. A posture is never gratuitous. It serves a function. Functional neurology thus invites identifying this function before any modification attempt.
Paillard's research also highlights the importance of multisensory integration in postural control. Posture results from a constant weighting between visual, vestibular, and somesthetic information. When one of these sources becomes less reliable, the nervous system adjusts posture to compensate. Excessive visual dependence, for example, can lead to specific postural strategies, perfectly coherent from a neurological standpoint.
In the context of Neuro-Postural Reprogramming, posture is read as an indicator of the quality of the sensorimotor loop. It provides information on how the nervous system prioritizes information, regulates tone, and anticipates constraints. It is never an end in itself, but an entry point to understanding overall functioning.
This non-pathological reading of posture allows intervention to be placed at the right level. It is not about correcting a "failing" body, but about improving the conditions in which the nervous system can produce a more adaptable organization. Posture then evolves as a consequence, not as an imposed objective.
Understanding posture from this angle naturally prepares the continuation of the article. If posture is a strategy, then complex movement, coordination, and performance must be reinterpreted as even finer expressions of this neurological organization. This is precisely what we will explore in the next chapter.
When movement exceeds simple and repetitive gestures, functional neurology becomes particularly visible. The more complex, fast, or unpredictable a task is, the more the organization of the nervous system is solicited. Complex movement is not an addition of muscles or segments. It is a fine neurological orchestration, dependent on the system's ability to perceive, integrate, and adjust in real-time.
In everyday life, this complexity appears as soon as the environment imposes multiple constraints. Climbing stairs while carrying a load, moving in a cluttered space, reacting to an unexpected event. In these situations, the body cannot simply execute a pre-established program. It must constantly adjust its posture, timing, and tone level based on available information.
For movement professionals, this reality is even more pronounced. Sports, in particular, expose the nervous system to extreme constraints. Speed, fatigue, time pressure, environmental uncertainty. Complex movement tests the system's ability to maintain effective organization despite information overload.
Roger Enoka's work has shown that fatigue is not only peripheral. It profoundly changes how the nervous system organizes movement. Under fatigue, muscle recruitment changes, timing degrades, coordination becomes less precise. The nervous system simplifies movement to preserve stability, sometimes at the expense of performance.
In everyday life, this simplification is visible when a tired person becomes clumsier. Movements are less fluid, errors more frequent. The body does not lack capacity. It lacks neurological availability. Movement becomes a more costly task to organize.
For movement professionals, this perspective helps understand why some performance losses are not resolved by simple strengthening or increased repetition. If the neurological load exceeds the system's integration capacity, adding constraint only accentuates defensive strategies. Movement becomes rigid, variability disappears.
Functional neurology is particularly interested in this relationship between complexity and variability. A performing system is not the one that always repeats the same gesture, but the one that can adjust this gesture according to the context. Motor variability is not an error. It is a marker of adaptation.
In everyday life, this variability allows for managing the unexpected. A slightly different step, an adjusted grip, a change of pace. These micro-variations allow for maintaining stability without excessive rigidity. When they disappear, movement becomes fragile.
For movement professionals, this notion is essential. Trying to fix a technical gesture can, in some contexts, limit adaptability. Functional neurology, on the contrary, invites the development of a sufficiently broad motor repertoire to face the diversity of encountered situations.
Thierry Paillard's work on dynamic stability reinforces this idea. They show that the ability to maintain balance in complex situations depends on the quality of sensory integration and the nervous system's ability to adjust tone and coordination. Stability is not an absence of movement, but an effective management of it.
In the context of Neuro-Postural Reprogramming, complex movement is read as a revealer. It highlights the strengths and limits of neurological organization. A loss of precision, increased rigidity, or excessive fatigue are all indicators of how the system manages complexity.
This perspective helps avoid a common confusion: interpreting a motor error as an isolated technical defect. Often, the error is the result of neurological overload. The nervous system makes a compromise. It sacrifices precision to preserve stability.
Understanding complex movement from the angle of functional neurology allows for repositioning intervention. It is not about removing complexity, but making the system capable of integrating it. Performance then becomes a consequence of adaptation, not the other way around.
This understanding naturally prepares the ground for the next chapter. If movement reveals the state of the nervous system, then it must be read accurately. This is precisely what the RNP reading of functional neurology proposes, which we will now address.
Functional neurology, when applied to movement, can quickly become confusing. Too often, it is reduced to an accumulation of tests, stimulations, or fixed interpretation grids. The Neuro-Postural Reprogramming deliberately takes another direction. It does not propose a neurology of intervention, but a neurology of reading.
Neurologically reading a movement, in an RNP approach, is not about looking for what is malfunctioning, but understanding how the nervous system organizes itself to face a given situation. Posture, coordination, stability, or rigidity are never interpreted as isolated errors. They are considered functional responses to a perceived context.
In everyday life, this reading profoundly changes the way the body is observed. A person who stands very straight, very braced, can be perceived as stable and toned. Yet, this organization may reflect high neurological vigilance, a protective strategy in response to a perceived uncertain situation. The body does not "malfunction." It adapts.
For movement professionals, this distinction is fundamental. The same observable manifestation can have very different neurological origins. Rigidity can be linked to sensory overload, central fatigue, excessive visual dependence, or a strategy to limit degrees of freedom. Without a global reading, intervention becomes random.
RNP reading is based on a simple principle: the nervous system constantly seeks the most viable solution, not the most aesthetic or the most efficient on paper. As long as this solution allows action without perceived danger, it is maintained. Any attempt to modify that does not respect this logic is rejected in the short or medium term.
In daily life, this logic explains why certain postures or motor habits persist despite repeated corrections. The system always returns to what it considers safest. RNP therefore does not seek to impose a change, but to understand what makes the current strategy necessary.
For movement professionals, RNP reading involves a change in intellectual posture. It is no longer about layering tools or exercises, but questioning the coherence of motor behavior. When does stability degrade? Under what conditions does rigidity appear? When does the system accept to release control?
Functional neurology, in this framework, becomes a language. A language that the body uses to express its internal state. A loss of coordination, persistent asymmetry, or reduced variability are all phrases spoken by the nervous system. RNP learns to hear them before seeking to modify them.
This approach is fully in line with work in motor control and posturology. Research by Thierry Paillard shows that stability and balance are dynamic processes, dependent on sensory integration and adaptability. RNP extends this vision by applying it to the entire movement, beyond static posture.
In sports, this reading is particularly valuable. An athlete may exhibit seemingly solid technique at low intensity, then become disorganized as speed or pressure increases. RNP does not read this as a technical flaw, but as an indicator of neurological overload. The movement reveals the current limits of the system's organization.
Neurologically reading is therefore not about anticipating a pathology. It is about understanding an adaptation. It is accepting that the nervous system sometimes makes compromises: sacrificing fluidity for stability, precision for safety, performance for viability.
Neuro-Postural Reprogramming is precisely situated in this place. It proposes a transversal, non-pathologizing reading that connects perception, posture, movement, and adaptation within a coherent framework. This reading allows for more accurate intervention, but above all, avoids unnecessary intervention.
In this sense, functional neurology applied to movement is not a toolbox. It is a framework of understanding. A way of looking at the body not as a set of parts to be corrected, but as an intelligent system constantly seeking to adapt to its environment.
It is this reading posture that RNP training seeks to develop: understanding before acting, observing before correcting, and respecting the system's logic before wanting to transform it.
If functional neurology applied to movement is neither a diagnosis nor a technique, then training in this field is not about learning protocols. Training, in an RNP logic, is about developing reading intelligence. An ability to understand how a nervous system organizes movement, how it adapts, and under what conditions it ceases to do so.
In everyday life, this intelligence profoundly changes the relationship with the body. It allows moving away from the logic of "doing well" or "doing poorly." A movement is no longer evaluated solely on its form, but on what it reveals about the system's state. Persistent rigidity, loss of coordination, or rapid fatigue cease to be problems to correct. They become information to interpret.
For movement professionals, this skill is crucial. It allows not confusing a mechanical deficit with a neurological strategy. A body that protects itself is not a failing body. It is a system that has identified a constraint it deems a priority. Without this reading, any intervention risks reinforcing already existing protection mechanisms.
RNP training aims precisely at this change of posture. It does not seek to produce practitioners capable of applying standardized solutions, but professionals capable of finely observing, posing functional hypotheses, and adjusting their intervention based on the system's responses. Movement becomes a field of exploration, not a space for correction.
In everyday life, this approach translates into greater tolerance for variability. The body is no longer required to conform to an ideal model. It is supported in its ability to adapt. This logic reduces the struggle against movement and promotes a more economical and sustainable organization.
For movement professionals, this neurological intelligence allows prioritizing. Not everything can be worked on at the same time. The nervous system has its own constraints, its own adaptation rhythms. RNP training teaches to recognize these constraints and respect the system's temporality, rather than trying to artificially accelerate the process.
Work in motor control and posturology, notably by Thierry Paillard and Roger Enoka, shows that stability, coordination, and balance are emerging processes. They cannot be decreed. They appear when conditions are met. RNP training is fully in line with this scientific continuity: it seeks to create favorable conditions, not to impose results.
In sports, this posture is particularly valuable. It allows supporting performance without rigidifying the system. A performing athlete is not the one who controls everything, but the one who can quickly adapt to the unexpected. This adaptability is primarily neurological. It depends on the system's ability to perceive, integrate, and adjust in real-time.
Training in functional neurology applied to movement, in an RNP logic, therefore means training in complexity. Accepting that human movement is never completely predictable. Understanding that each individual develops strategies based on their history, environment, and constraints.
This intelligence of movement is not reserved for an elite. It is accessible to anyone willing to observe without judging, interpret without medicalizing, and intervene with humility. It requires time, experience, and constant questioning, but it offers in return a much finer understanding of human functioning.
In this sense, RNP training does not offer a definitive answer to movement issues. It offers a framework. A framework that allows thinking of movement as a living, evolving, and deeply contextual neurological expression.
It is this reading ability, more than any isolated technique, that constitutes the true heart of functional neurology applied to movement.
Movement is never merely a matter of muscles or technique. It is the direct expression of how the nervous system perceives, organizes, and adapts to its environment. When it becomes rigid, imprecise, or costly, it is not the body that fails, but a neurological strategy that is protecting itself.
Understanding functional neurology applied to movement means accepting to shift perspective: observing before correcting, interpreting before intervening. Neuro-Postural Reprogramming follows this logic, offering a coherent, non-pathologizing interpretation of human movement.
At this precise point, posture, coordination, and performance cease to be goals to achieve. They become indicators. And it is often here that a truly sustainable understanding of movement begins.
What is the purpose of the vagus nerve, what are the signs when it malfunctions, and how to truly train it: learn to measure it through your heart rate variability, not just stimulate it.
Read the article The RNP from Different PerspectivesDiscover how LabO RNP fills the operational gap in the training of human movement professionals between biomechanics and neuroscience.
Read the article The RNP from Different PerspectivesNeuro-Postural Reprogramming (NPR) is a French-speaking professional discipline founded in 2020 by three physical trainers (Sébastien Zimmer, Adrien Chartier, Romain Katchavenda). It teaches human movement professionals to interpret the motor decision preceding a gesture through an integrative framework with four pillars (functional neurology, primitive reflexes, posturology, training), and then to reprogram it.
Read the articleThe RNP system is meant to be read, targeted and tested from your next assessment. Start with the member space, for free.